So it is "dishonest" to favor the view that I agree with? That is an odd position. I usually tend to favor what I agree with, don't you? If this was your big strategy to trick me, I have to admit it will work every time.
Your ideas about a front controller and those you read about were started by Craig and have appeared periodically on this page. I want to emphasize that this is not a qusetion of semantics. Call what you call a front controller anything you like. The fact that it is decoupled in the way I specificed is enough to make me dislike it. On 3/20/06, Alexandre Poitras <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote > > > > >. The third disagrees with you and agrees with me: > > > > "JSF uses the Page Controller Pattern. Although there is a single > servlet > > every faces request goes through, the job of the servlet is to receive a > > faces page with components. It will then fire off events for each > component > > and render the components using a render toolkit. The components can > also be > > bound to data from the model. The faces life-cycle is illustrated in > Figure > > 2." > > > You know I have thrown this one in just to see how honest you were, I > wanted to see if you were going to take the only part that you like > and you did. I don't agree with the guy and I could be wrong but most > sources I have red agree with the facts that JSF is front controller > oriented. Unless someone give me strong evidences, I will continue to > clear the FUD about it. > -- "You can lead a horse to water but you cannot make it float on its back." ~Dakota Jack~
