He’s not PMC but committer, so he can help anyway ;) Regards JB
> Le 18 mai 2021 à 17:23, COURTAULT Francois > <francois.courta...@thalesgroup.com> a écrit : > > Hello, > > I don't think Romain is still the PMC for TomEE. > > Best Regards. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Jean-Baptiste Onofre <j...@nanthrax.net> > Sent: mardi 18 mai 2021 17:19 > To: users@activemq.apache.org > Subject: Re: Which activeMQ (not Artemis) version will be JMS 2.0 or 3.0 ? > > Hi, > > I’m sure I can ask help from Romain about TomEE releases ;) > > Regards > JB > >> Le 18 mai 2021 à 17:09, COURTAULT Francois >> <francois.courta...@thalesgroup.com> a écrit : >> >> Hello Jean-Baptiste, >> >> We are using ActiveMQ in TomEE context. >> So I am just curious about when this version could be included in TomEE >> releases. I will push for that. >> >> Best Regards. >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Jean-Baptiste Onofre <j...@nanthrax.net <mailto:j...@nanthrax.net>> >> Sent: mardi 18 mai 2021 17:05 >> To: users@activemq.apache.org <mailto:users@activemq.apache.org> >> Subject: Re: Which activeMQ (not Artemis) version will be JMS 2.0 or 3.0 ? >> >> Hi, >> >> The purpose of the RC is to cut an early release (kind of "cut SNAPSHOT") to >> allow users to test it before the first "official" release. >> >> What I can propose to you is: >> >> 1. I need couple of weeks to open the PRs and merge it (I’m on JDK11 now, >> identifying/fixing/disabling some tests) 2. When done, I will inform you on >> the mailing list allowing you to test using the SNAPSHOTs (5.17.0-SNAPSHOT) >> 3. If I don’t see any blocker on SNAPSHOT, then I will move forward on >> 5.17.0 release >> >> Does it sound good to you ? >> >> Regards >> JB >> >>> Le 18 mai 2021 à 16:59, Simon Billingsley >>> <simon.billings...@matrixx.com.INVALID> a écrit : >>> >>> Thanks for the details information. >>> I am interested in the Log4J 2 upgrade. >>> How long does the release take after the RC process normally? >>> >>> Best regards, >>> Simon. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> On 18 May 2021, at 15:53, Jean-Baptiste Onofre <j...@nanthrax.net >>> <mailto:j...@nanthrax.net> <mailto:j...@nanthrax.net >>> <mailto:j...@nanthrax.net>><mailto:j...@nanthrax.net >>> <mailto:j...@nanthrax.net><mailto:j...@nanthrax.net >>> <mailto:j...@nanthrax.net>>>> wrote: >>> >>> Hi François, >>> >>> ActiveMQ 5.17.0 will support JMS 2.0. >>> >>> Basically, what I’m planning for ActiveMQ 5.17.0: >>> - JDK11 build >>> - Spring 5 >>> - Log4j2 >>> - JMS 2.0 >>> >>> About date target, I’m working on JDK11 build now and the other PRs will >>> follow. I would like to submit a first 5.17 RC end of June. >>> >>> Regards >>> JB >>> >>> Le 18 mai 2021 à 16:48, COURTAULT Francois >>> <francois.courta...@thalesgroup.com >>> <mailto:francois.courta...@thalesgroup.com> >>> <mailto:francois.courta...@thalesgroup.com >>> <mailto:francois.courta...@thalesgroup.com>><mailto:francois.courta...@thalesgroup.com >>> <mailto:francois.courta...@thalesgroup.com> >>> <mailto:francois.courta...@thalesgroup.com >>> <mailto:francois.courta...@thalesgroup.com>>>> a écrit : >>> >>> Hello, >>> >>> The question to be answered is in the Subject. >>> >>> Best Regards. >