He’s not PMC but committer, so he can help anyway ;)

Regards
JB

> Le 18 mai 2021 à 17:23, COURTAULT Francois 
> <francois.courta...@thalesgroup.com> a écrit :
> 
> Hello,
> 
> I don't think Romain is still the PMC for TomEE.
> 
> Best Regards.
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jean-Baptiste Onofre <j...@nanthrax.net> 
> Sent: mardi 18 mai 2021 17:19
> To: users@activemq.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Which activeMQ (not Artemis) version will be JMS 2.0 or 3.0 ?
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I’m sure I can ask help from Romain about TomEE releases ;)
> 
> Regards
> JB
> 
>> Le 18 mai 2021 à 17:09, COURTAULT Francois 
>> <francois.courta...@thalesgroup.com> a écrit :
>> 
>> Hello Jean-Baptiste,
>> 
>> We are using ActiveMQ in TomEE context.
>> So I am just curious about when this version could be included in TomEE 
>> releases. I will push for that.
>> 
>> Best Regards.
>> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Jean-Baptiste Onofre <j...@nanthrax.net <mailto:j...@nanthrax.net>> 
>> Sent: mardi 18 mai 2021 17:05
>> To: users@activemq.apache.org <mailto:users@activemq.apache.org>
>> Subject: Re: Which activeMQ (not Artemis) version will be JMS 2.0 or 3.0 ?
>> 
>> Hi,
>> 
>> The purpose of the RC is to cut an early release (kind of "cut SNAPSHOT") to 
>> allow users to test it before the first "official" release.
>> 
>> What I can propose to you is:
>> 
>> 1. I need couple of weeks to open the PRs and merge it (I’m on JDK11 now, 
>> identifying/fixing/disabling some tests) 2. When done, I will inform you on 
>> the mailing list allowing you to test using the SNAPSHOTs (5.17.0-SNAPSHOT) 
>> 3. If I don’t see any blocker on SNAPSHOT, then I will move forward on 
>> 5.17.0 release
>> 
>> Does it sound good to you ?
>> 
>> Regards
>> JB
>> 
>>> Le 18 mai 2021 à 16:59, Simon Billingsley 
>>> <simon.billings...@matrixx.com.INVALID> a écrit :
>>> 
>>> Thanks for the details information.
>>> I am interested in the Log4J 2 upgrade.
>>> How long does the release take after the RC process normally?
>>> 
>>> Best regards,
>>> Simon.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On 18 May 2021, at 15:53, Jean-Baptiste Onofre <j...@nanthrax.net 
>>> <mailto:j...@nanthrax.net> <mailto:j...@nanthrax.net 
>>> <mailto:j...@nanthrax.net>><mailto:j...@nanthrax.net 
>>> <mailto:j...@nanthrax.net><mailto:j...@nanthrax.net 
>>> <mailto:j...@nanthrax.net>>>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Hi François,
>>> 
>>> ActiveMQ 5.17.0 will support JMS 2.0.
>>> 
>>> Basically, what I’m planning for ActiveMQ 5.17.0:
>>> - JDK11 build
>>> - Spring 5
>>> - Log4j2
>>> - JMS 2.0
>>> 
>>> About date target, I’m working on JDK11 build now and the other PRs will 
>>> follow. I would like to submit a first 5.17 RC end of June.
>>> 
>>> Regards
>>> JB
>>> 
>>> Le 18 mai 2021 à 16:48, COURTAULT Francois 
>>> <francois.courta...@thalesgroup.com 
>>> <mailto:francois.courta...@thalesgroup.com> 
>>> <mailto:francois.courta...@thalesgroup.com 
>>> <mailto:francois.courta...@thalesgroup.com>><mailto:francois.courta...@thalesgroup.com
>>>  <mailto:francois.courta...@thalesgroup.com> 
>>> <mailto:francois.courta...@thalesgroup.com 
>>> <mailto:francois.courta...@thalesgroup.com>>>> a écrit :
>>> 
>>> Hello,
>>> 
>>> The question to be answered is in the Subject.
>>> 
>>> Best Regards.
> 

Reply via email to