It’s something that we already discussed and I moved forward on the PR. I propose to move forward on JMS 2.0 support.
If the community agree, and tests are fine, I don’t see any issue to support it in 5.17.0 as best effort. Anyway, I will propose the PR, and see when to include it. Regards JB > Le 18 mai 2021 à 17:36, Christopher Shannon <christopher.l.shan...@gmail.com> > a écrit : > > Since when is JMS 2.0 supposed to be supported by 5.17.0? > > None of the features are implemented on the server side for the new API > calls. This was brought up in a dev discussion that there won't be JMS 2.0 > support on the server side in this release. > > On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 11:29 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofre <j...@nanthrax.net> > wrote: > >> He’s not PMC but committer, so he can help anyway ;) >> >> Regards >> JB >> >>> Le 18 mai 2021 à 17:23, COURTAULT Francois < >> francois.courta...@thalesgroup.com> a écrit : >>> >>> Hello, >>> >>> I don't think Romain is still the PMC for TomEE. >>> >>> Best Regards. >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: Jean-Baptiste Onofre <j...@nanthrax.net> >>> Sent: mardi 18 mai 2021 17:19 >>> To: users@activemq.apache.org >>> Subject: Re: Which activeMQ (not Artemis) version will be JMS 2.0 or 3.0 >> ? >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> I’m sure I can ask help from Romain about TomEE releases ;) >>> >>> Regards >>> JB >>> >>>> Le 18 mai 2021 à 17:09, COURTAULT Francois < >> francois.courta...@thalesgroup.com> a écrit : >>>> >>>> Hello Jean-Baptiste, >>>> >>>> We are using ActiveMQ in TomEE context. >>>> So I am just curious about when this version could be included in TomEE >> releases. I will push for that. >>>> >>>> Best Regards. >>>> >>>> -----Original Message----- >>>> From: Jean-Baptiste Onofre <j...@nanthrax.net <mailto:j...@nanthrax.net>> >>>> Sent: mardi 18 mai 2021 17:05 >>>> To: users@activemq.apache.org <mailto:users@activemq.apache.org> >>>> Subject: Re: Which activeMQ (not Artemis) version will be JMS 2.0 or >> 3.0 ? >>>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> The purpose of the RC is to cut an early release (kind of "cut >> SNAPSHOT") to allow users to test it before the first "official" release. >>>> >>>> What I can propose to you is: >>>> >>>> 1. I need couple of weeks to open the PRs and merge it (I’m on JDK11 >> now, identifying/fixing/disabling some tests) 2. When done, I will inform >> you on the mailing list allowing you to test using the SNAPSHOTs >> (5.17.0-SNAPSHOT) 3. If I don’t see any blocker on SNAPSHOT, then I will >> move forward on 5.17.0 release >>>> >>>> Does it sound good to you ? >>>> >>>> Regards >>>> JB >>>> >>>>> Le 18 mai 2021 à 16:59, Simon Billingsley >> <simon.billings...@matrixx.com.INVALID> a écrit : >>>>> >>>>> Thanks for the details information. >>>>> I am interested in the Log4J 2 upgrade. >>>>> How long does the release take after the RC process normally? >>>>> >>>>> Best regards, >>>>> Simon. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On 18 May 2021, at 15:53, Jean-Baptiste Onofre <j...@nanthrax.net >> <mailto:j...@nanthrax.net> <mailto:j...@nanthrax.net >> <mailto:j...@nanthrax.net >>>> <mailto:j...@nanthrax.net >>>> <mailto:j...@nanthrax.net><mailto:j...@nanthrax.net >> <mailto:j...@nanthrax.net>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Hi François, >>>>> >>>>> ActiveMQ 5.17.0 will support JMS 2.0. >>>>> >>>>> Basically, what I’m planning for ActiveMQ 5.17.0: >>>>> - JDK11 build >>>>> - Spring 5 >>>>> - Log4j2 >>>>> - JMS 2.0 >>>>> >>>>> About date target, I’m working on JDK11 build now and the other PRs >> will follow. I would like to submit a first 5.17 RC end of June. >>>>> >>>>> Regards >>>>> JB >>>>> >>>>> Le 18 mai 2021 à 16:48, COURTAULT Francois < >> francois.courta...@thalesgroup.com <mailto: >> francois.courta...@thalesgroup.com> <mailto: >> francois.courta...@thalesgroup.com <mailto: >> francois.courta...@thalesgroup.com>><mailto: >> francois.courta...@thalesgroup.com <mailto: >> francois.courta...@thalesgroup.com> <mailto: >> francois.courta...@thalesgroup.com <mailto: >> francois.courta...@thalesgroup.com>>>> a écrit : >>>>> >>>>> Hello, >>>>> >>>>> The question to be answered is in the Subject. >>>>> >>>>> Best Regards. >>> >> >>
