Since when is JMS 2.0 supposed to be supported by 5.17.0? None of the features are implemented on the server side for the new API calls. This was brought up in a dev discussion that there won't be JMS 2.0 support on the server side in this release.
On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 11:29 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofre <j...@nanthrax.net> wrote: > He’s not PMC but committer, so he can help anyway ;) > > Regards > JB > > > Le 18 mai 2021 à 17:23, COURTAULT Francois < > francois.courta...@thalesgroup.com> a écrit : > > > > Hello, > > > > I don't think Romain is still the PMC for TomEE. > > > > Best Regards. > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Jean-Baptiste Onofre <j...@nanthrax.net> > > Sent: mardi 18 mai 2021 17:19 > > To: users@activemq.apache.org > > Subject: Re: Which activeMQ (not Artemis) version will be JMS 2.0 or 3.0 > ? > > > > Hi, > > > > I’m sure I can ask help from Romain about TomEE releases ;) > > > > Regards > > JB > > > >> Le 18 mai 2021 à 17:09, COURTAULT Francois < > francois.courta...@thalesgroup.com> a écrit : > >> > >> Hello Jean-Baptiste, > >> > >> We are using ActiveMQ in TomEE context. > >> So I am just curious about when this version could be included in TomEE > releases. I will push for that. > >> > >> Best Regards. > >> > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: Jean-Baptiste Onofre <j...@nanthrax.net <mailto:j...@nanthrax.net>> > >> Sent: mardi 18 mai 2021 17:05 > >> To: users@activemq.apache.org <mailto:users@activemq.apache.org> > >> Subject: Re: Which activeMQ (not Artemis) version will be JMS 2.0 or > 3.0 ? > >> > >> Hi, > >> > >> The purpose of the RC is to cut an early release (kind of "cut > SNAPSHOT") to allow users to test it before the first "official" release. > >> > >> What I can propose to you is: > >> > >> 1. I need couple of weeks to open the PRs and merge it (I’m on JDK11 > now, identifying/fixing/disabling some tests) 2. When done, I will inform > you on the mailing list allowing you to test using the SNAPSHOTs > (5.17.0-SNAPSHOT) 3. If I don’t see any blocker on SNAPSHOT, then I will > move forward on 5.17.0 release > >> > >> Does it sound good to you ? > >> > >> Regards > >> JB > >> > >>> Le 18 mai 2021 à 16:59, Simon Billingsley > <simon.billings...@matrixx.com.INVALID> a écrit : > >>> > >>> Thanks for the details information. > >>> I am interested in the Log4J 2 upgrade. > >>> How long does the release take after the RC process normally? > >>> > >>> Best regards, > >>> Simon. > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> On 18 May 2021, at 15:53, Jean-Baptiste Onofre <j...@nanthrax.net > <mailto:j...@nanthrax.net> <mailto:j...@nanthrax.net <mailto:j...@nanthrax.net > >><mailto:j...@nanthrax.net > >><mailto:j...@nanthrax.net><mailto:j...@nanthrax.net > <mailto:j...@nanthrax.net>>>> wrote: > >>> > >>> Hi François, > >>> > >>> ActiveMQ 5.17.0 will support JMS 2.0. > >>> > >>> Basically, what I’m planning for ActiveMQ 5.17.0: > >>> - JDK11 build > >>> - Spring 5 > >>> - Log4j2 > >>> - JMS 2.0 > >>> > >>> About date target, I’m working on JDK11 build now and the other PRs > will follow. I would like to submit a first 5.17 RC end of June. > >>> > >>> Regards > >>> JB > >>> > >>> Le 18 mai 2021 à 16:48, COURTAULT Francois < > francois.courta...@thalesgroup.com <mailto: > francois.courta...@thalesgroup.com> <mailto: > francois.courta...@thalesgroup.com <mailto: > francois.courta...@thalesgroup.com>><mailto: > francois.courta...@thalesgroup.com <mailto: > francois.courta...@thalesgroup.com> <mailto: > francois.courta...@thalesgroup.com <mailto: > francois.courta...@thalesgroup.com>>>> a écrit : > >>> > >>> Hello, > >>> > >>> The question to be answered is in the Subject. > >>> > >>> Best Regards. > > > >
