On Jun 3, 2014, at 6:31 PM, hossein zabolzadeh <zabolza...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Is there any idea, about "*XMPP over virtualization*" advantages(Added
> values)?


Hossein, that question does not make any sense to me. XMPP is a protocol for 
messaging and presence.
You can't compare XMPP and virtualization.

> What the ArchipelProject is looking for?

No idea, I have never used it, but looks like they use xmpp for virtual machine 
monitoring and it seems provisioning.
You asked about XMPP and cloudstack, I googled and found this project which 
seems of interest,

> Sebastien, what do you think?

Check out archipelprojet, head to scholar.google.com , do some research, read
write some code with xmpp, install ejabberd.

What I do think is that XMPP is cool and highly scalable, so it can be used as 
a communication protocol for distributed systems, especially one where the 
agents are transients.

Have at it ...

> 
> 
> On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 3:45 PM, sebgoa <run...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> 
>> On Jun 3, 2014, at 1:11 PM, hossein zabolzadeh <zabolza...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> 
>>> Intresting.
>>> Can you explain exactly what new feature the archipelproject is
>>> delivered(By the aim of XMPP) that the current cloudstack can not do?
>>> I want to know the exact role of the XMPP and the added value provided by
>>> this instance messaging protocol in a virtualization era.
>>> 
>> 
>> You are the one who asked about this…I don't know.
>> 
>>> 
>>> On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 11:20 AM, Sebastien Goasguen <run...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> You could definitely use xmpp as command and control in your instances.
>>>> This has been done before :
>>>> 
>>>> http://archipelproject.org
>>>> 
>>>> You could write xmpp hooks to call the cloudstack api as well
>>>> 
>>>> I used to be involved in this project:
>>>> https://github.com/legastero/Kestrel
>>>> 
>>>> Which allowed you to run batch processing jobs on pools of VMs using
>> XMPP.
>>>> 
>>>> On Jun 1, 2014, at 5:59 AM, hossein zabolzadeh <zabolza...@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> @David
>>>>> Thanks.
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> On Sun, Jun 1, 2014 at 2:16 PM, Nux! <n...@li.nux.ro> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>>> On 01.06.2014 10:21, hossein zabolzadeh wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> @David
>>>>>>> AMQP is not instance messaging. Does the cloudstack use AMPQ for its
>>>>>>> message passing mechanism?
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> http://www.chipchilders.com/blog/2013/7/16/tapping-into-
>>>>>> apache-cloudstack-events-via-amqp.html
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Nux!
>>>>>> www.nux.ro
>>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>> 
>> 

Reply via email to