Those are great questions for their mailing list. No one here knows about archipelproject, i just gave you a reference.
-Sebastien > On 3 Jun 2014, at 21:57, hossein zabolzadeh <zabolza...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi Sebgoa. > I didn't want to compare XMPP and virtualization. I want to know why using > XMPP comes into somebody's Mind?(Archipel Community) They wanted to satisfy > which feature that was not and currently is not addressed in cloudstack > and/or other CMPs(e.g. OpenStack, OpenNebula, ...)? > Which problem they want to solve by the aim of XMPP protocol? > > >> On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 10:44 PM, sebgoa <run...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >> On Jun 3, 2014, at 6:31 PM, hossein zabolzadeh <zabolza...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> Is there any idea, about "*XMPP over virtualization*" advantages(Added >>> values)? >> >> >> Hossein, that question does not make any sense to me. XMPP is a protocol >> for messaging and presence. >> You can't compare XMPP and virtualization. > > >>> What the ArchipelProject is looking for? >> >> No idea, I have never used it, but looks like they use xmpp for virtual >> machine monitoring and it seems provisioning. >> You asked about XMPP and cloudstack, I googled and found this project >> which seems of interest, > > >>> Sebastien, what do you think? >> >> Check out archipelprojet, head to scholar.google.com , do some research, >> read >> write some code with xmpp, install ejabberd. >> >> What I do think is that XMPP is cool and highly scalable, so it can be >> used as a communication protocol for distributed systems, especially one >> where the agents are transients. >> >> Have at it ... >> >>> >>> >>>> On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 3:45 PM, sebgoa <run...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> On Jun 3, 2014, at 1:11 PM, hossein zabolzadeh <zabolza...@gmail.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Intresting. >>>>> Can you explain exactly what new feature the archipelproject is >>>>> delivered(By the aim of XMPP) that the current cloudstack can not do? >>>>> I want to know the exact role of the XMPP and the added value provided >> by >>>>> this instance messaging protocol in a virtualization era. >>>> >>>> You are the one who asked about this…I don't know. >>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 11:20 AM, Sebastien Goasguen <run...@gmail.com> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> You could definitely use xmpp as command and control in your >> instances. >>>>>> This has been done before : >>>>>> >>>>>> http://archipelproject.org >>>>>> >>>>>> You could write xmpp hooks to call the cloudstack api as well >>>>>> >>>>>> I used to be involved in this project: >>>>>> https://github.com/legastero/Kestrel >>>>>> >>>>>> Which allowed you to run batch processing jobs on pools of VMs using >>>> XMPP. >>>>>> >>>>>> On Jun 1, 2014, at 5:59 AM, hossein zabolzadeh <zabolza...@gmail.com> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> @David >>>>>>> Thanks. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Sun, Jun 1, 2014 at 2:16 PM, Nux! <n...@li.nux.ro> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On 01.06.2014 10:21, hossein zabolzadeh wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> @David >>>>>>>>> AMQP is not instance messaging. Does the cloudstack use AMPQ for >> its >>>>>>>>> message passing mechanism? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> http://www.chipchilders.com/blog/2013/7/16/tapping-into- >>>>>>>> apache-cloudstack-events-via-amqp.html >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>> Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Nux! >>>>>>>> www.nux.ro >> >>
