Is your Virtual Router up and running ? If is in running state you can mark it Done and deploy a VM. If it is in stopped state try restarting it. You can try updating the field as well.
-Harikrishna On 07-Jul-2014, at 7:10 pm, Elliot Berg <elliot.b...@avcosystems.com> wrote: > I can see two entries that have the "step" field set to something other than > "Done", one of them is > > ConsoleProxy | Starting > > and the other is > > DomainRouter | Prepare > > Am I safe to just delete the rows, or should I just update the field? > > Thanks, > > Elliot > > Harikrishna Patnala wrote: >> Do you see any work item pending for Virtual Router r-4-VM in “op_it_work” >> table ? >> If there are any, remove those entries and try VM deployment again. >> >> I see in the logs that VR has a task pending >> 2014-07-07 10:28:15,934 WARN [cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl] >> (Job-Executor-5:job-48 = [ 22369802-b5aa-4b5a-a26d-1fab11241551 ]) The task >> item for vm VM[DomainRouter|r-4-VM] has been inactive for 418531 >> >> >> -Harikrishna >> >> >> On 07-Jul-2014, at 2:18 pm, Elliot >> Berg<elliot.b...@avcosystems.com<mailto:elliot.b...@avcosystems.com>> wrote: >> >> I'm still not really spotting anything indicating why it's not using the >> host, but I suspect that's just because I don't really know what I'm looking >> for - so I've zipped the whole log for today and stuffed it on dropbox at >> https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/47728104/management-server.log.gz. >> >> Hopefully someone who's used cloudstack a lot more will have more success! >> >> Thanks, >> >> Elliot >> >> >> Elliot Berg wrote: >> I'm going back over everything and I've noticed something else - everywhere >> I've looked for how to use local storage says I should change two global >> settings; >> >> >> * system.vm.use.local.storage = true >> * use.local.storage = true >> >> However I'm looking at my global settings and only the first exists (which I >> have set to true). >> >> Elliot >> >> Elliot Berg wrote: >> Ah, so when looking back a bit further before (I was kind of only looking >> for exceptions higher up before now), I've just spotted this... >> >> 2014-07-03 10:48:28,765 DEBUG [allocator.impl.FirstFitAllocator] >> (Job-Executor-3:job-46 = [ 92fb959d-edc5-4fe2-84a0-5 >> 6001226e4ac ] FirstFitRoutingAllocator) Looking for speed=1000Mhz, Ram=1024 >> 2014-07-03 10:48:28,765 DEBUG [allocator.impl.FirstFitAllocator] >> (Job-Executor-3:job-46 = [ 92fb959d-edc5-4fe2-84a0-5 >> 6001226e4ac ] FirstFitRoutingAllocator) Host name: cloudstack-host1, hostId: >> 1 is in avoid set, skipping this and try >> ing other available hosts >> >> That's the one and only host - so I'm guessing that has something to do with >> it! >> >> Elliot >> -- >> Elliot Berg | Analyst Programmer/Network Team >> Email: elliot.b...@avcosystems.com<mailto:elliot.b...@avcosystems.com> | >> Tel: 01753 213700 | Web: www.avcosystems.com<http://www.avcosystems.com/> >> <image.png> >> >> Avco Systems Ltd, Registered in England& Wales, Registration Number 1976620 >> Registered Office: Avco Systems | 17 Bath Road | Slough | SL1 3UF >> >> >> ilya musayev wrote: >> Elliot, >> >> When you see such an error - there usually a predecessor message that says >> CloudStack checked for X, Y and Z and found no suitable resources based on >> your configuration. >> >> Put the logs on pastebin or some other site (strip out any private info you >> dont want to share). I would also recommend cloudstack 4.3.1 (which is not >> officially out yet) but should come thru in the next several weeks. Its >> latest stable release of CloudStack 4.3.0 - with latest bug fixes. >> >> I've put a build for folks who want to try it out until we complete official >> release of ACS 4.3.1 process. >> >> Unzip tgz and it should have required RPMs with both Open Source and >> Non-Open Source modules. >> >> http://www.cloudsand.com/cloudstack-4.3.0-1.tgz >> >> Regards >> ilya >> >> >> On 7/2/14, 1:06 AM, Elliot Berg wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I've been putting together a cloudstack set-up for experimentation purposes >> - right now we're just trying to compare different platforms for private >> cloud infrastructure before we start getting too in depth with any of them. >> >> I've added the cloudstack 4.2 apt repository, and I'm running on Ubuntu >> 12.04 LTS, and I believe I've followed all the installation guides correctly >> at the various stages. >> >> We've set up a management server, which is also an NFS server, however we're >> interested in using local storage for the majority of things, and have also >> set up a single KVM host which I believe is all configured correctly to use >> local storage. If I look at the dashboard, I'm told I have more than enough >> resource in every section to create an instance the size I want to - which >> is a small offering I've created with just 1.0GHz and 1GB of RAM, with local >> storage. The host's not very powerful, but according to the dashboard I am >> using 1.50GHz/5.87GHz, 1.38GB/7.80GB, 3.55GB/285.95GB Secondary Storage, >> 1.03GB/450.99GB Local Storage and 0.00KB/571.90GB Primary Storage (I'm >> assuming that's meant to be a combination of the NFS server's primary >> storage offering and the local storage on the host, though the numbers don't >> quite make sense at first glance). >> >> However, when I try to add an instance, I receive an >> InsufficientServerCapacityException and I'm struggling to work out why. I >> can't add an instance using a small shared storage offering either, but if >> I'm not mistaken that's expected because the zone and host are configured to >> use local storage. The only thing I can think of is that the local storage >> isn't properly configured, but when I've looked it seems to be. >> >> Any pointers for how I can further diagnose this would be great - thanks in >> advance! >> >> Elliot >> >> >> >> >>
