1) Log into your KVM host.
2) Use command “virsh list”. This gives the list of VMs on the host.
3) Use command “virsh console <VirtualRouterId>” to log into the VR.
-Harikrishna
On 09-Jul-2014, at 3:52 pm, Elliot Berg <elliot.b...@avcosystems.com> wrote:
> I don't know - I can't seem to ssh to the link local IP. It pings, but ssh
> times out. If I try and use the "connect to console" button in the gui, that
> too times out :(
>
> Elliot
>
> Harikrishna Patnala wrote:
>> > From the logs
>> 2014-07-08 12:08:56,218 DEBUG [agent.transport.Request]
>> (AgentManager-Handler-1:null) Seq 1-277348416: Processing: { Ans: , MgmtId:
>> 159320647860937, via: 1, Ver: v1, Flags: 110,
>> [{"com.cloud.agent.api.Answer":{"result":false,"details":"grep:
>> /var/lib/misc/dnsmasq.leases: No such file or directory","wait":0}}] }
>>
>> Can you check whether dnsmasq service is running in the Virtual Router ? if
>> not, start the service and check for “/var/lib/misc/dnsmasq.leases”
>>
>> -Harikrishna
>>
>> On 08-Jul-2014, at 3:47 pm, Elliot Berg<elliot.b...@avcosystems.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I've done that, and now there's a new virtual router which says it's
>>> running, however a deployment still fails. My latest lot of logs are
>>> available at
>>> https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/47728104/management-server.log.gz, and
>>> there's now one thing in the op_it_work table with a step != 'Done', which
>>> is a ConsoleProxy.
>>>
>>> Interestingly if I look at the console proxy vm in the cloudstack
>>> management gui it says it's running, though.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> Elliot
>>>
>>> Harikrishna Patnala wrote:
>>>> Yes mark the VR to stopped, destroy VR, mark the VR entry in op_it_work to
>>>> “Done” and try deploying VM.
>>>>
>>>> -Harikrishna
>>>>
>>>> On 08-Jul-2014, at 12:44 pm, Elliot Berg<elliot.b...@avcosystems.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> It appears to be stuck in the "starting" state - so I don't get the
>>>>> option to reboot it or anything. If I change the state to stopped in the
>>>>> database directly will the management server attempt to start it again or
>>>>> do I need to do something more?
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks!
>>>>>
>>>>> Elliot
>>>>>
>>>>> Harikrishna Patnala wrote:
>>>>>> Is your Virtual Router up and running ? If is in running state you can
>>>>>> mark it Done and deploy a VM.
>>>>>> If it is in stopped state try restarting it. You can try updating the
>>>>>> field as well.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -Harikrishna
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 07-Jul-2014, at 7:10 pm, Elliot Berg<elliot.b...@avcosystems.com>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I can see two entries that have the "step" field set to something other
>>>>>>> than "Done", one of them is
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ConsoleProxy | Starting
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> and the other is
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> DomainRouter | Prepare
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Am I safe to just delete the rows, or should I just update the field?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Elliot
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Harikrishna Patnala wrote:
>>>>>>>> Do you see any work item pending for Virtual Router r-4-VM in
>>>>>>>> “op_it_work” table ?
>>>>>>>> If there are any, remove those entries and try VM deployment again.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I see in the logs that VR has a task pending
>>>>>>>> 2014-07-07 10:28:15,934 WARN [cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl]
>>>>>>>> (Job-Executor-5:job-48 = [ 22369802-b5aa-4b5a-a26d-1fab11241551 ]) The
>>>>>>>> task item for vm VM[DomainRouter|r-4-VM] has been inactive for 418531
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> -Harikrishna
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 07-Jul-2014, at 2:18 pm, Elliot
>>>>>>>> Berg<elliot.b...@avcosystems.com<mailto:elliot.b...@avcosystems.com>>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I'm still not really spotting anything indicating why it's not using
>>>>>>>> the host, but I suspect that's just because I don't really know what
>>>>>>>> I'm looking for - so I've zipped the whole log for today and stuffed
>>>>>>>> it on dropbox at
>>>>>>>> https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/47728104/management-server.log.gz.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hopefully someone who's used cloudstack a lot more will have more
>>>>>>>> success!
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Elliot
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Elliot Berg wrote:
>>>>>>>> I'm going back over everything and I've noticed something else -
>>>>>>>> everywhere I've looked for how to use local storage says I should
>>>>>>>> change two global settings;
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> * system.vm.use.local.storage = true
>>>>>>>> * use.local.storage = true
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> However I'm looking at my global settings and only the first exists
>>>>>>>> (which I have set to true).
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Elliot
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Elliot Berg wrote:
>>>>>>>> Ah, so when looking back a bit further before (I was kind of only
>>>>>>>> looking for exceptions higher up before now), I've just spotted this...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> 2014-07-03 10:48:28,765 DEBUG [allocator.impl.FirstFitAllocator]
>>>>>>>> (Job-Executor-3:job-46 = [ 92fb959d-edc5-4fe2-84a0-5
>>>>>>>> 6001226e4ac ] FirstFitRoutingAllocator) Looking for speed=1000Mhz,
>>>>>>>> Ram=1024
>>>>>>>> 2014-07-03 10:48:28,765 DEBUG [allocator.impl.FirstFitAllocator]
>>>>>>>> (Job-Executor-3:job-46 = [ 92fb959d-edc5-4fe2-84a0-5
>>>>>>>> 6001226e4ac ] FirstFitRoutingAllocator) Host name: cloudstack-host1,
>>>>>>>> hostId: 1 is in avoid set, skipping this and try
>>>>>>>> ing other available hosts
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> That's the one and only host - so I'm guessing that has something to
>>>>>>>> do with it!
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Elliot
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> Elliot Berg | Analyst Programmer/Network Team
>>>>>>>> Email:
>>>>>>>> elliot.b...@avcosystems.com<mailto:elliot.b...@avcosystems.com> |
>>>>>>>> Tel: 01753 213700 | Web:
>>>>>>>> www.avcosystems.com<http://www.avcosystems.com/>
>>>>>>>> <image.png>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Avco Systems Ltd, Registered in England& Wales, Registration
>>>>>>>> Number 1976620
>>>>>>>> Registered Office: Avco Systems | 17 Bath Road | Slough | SL1 3UF
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> ilya musayev wrote:
>>>>>>>> Elliot,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> When you see such an error - there usually a predecessor message that
>>>>>>>> says CloudStack checked for X, Y and Z and found no suitable resources
>>>>>>>> based on your configuration.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Put the logs on pastebin or some other site (strip out any private
>>>>>>>> info you dont want to share). I would also recommend cloudstack 4.3.1
>>>>>>>> (which is not officially out yet) but should come thru in the next
>>>>>>>> several weeks. Its latest stable release of CloudStack 4.3.0 - with
>>>>>>>> latest bug fixes.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I've put a build for folks who want to try it out until we complete
>>>>>>>> official release of ACS 4.3.1 process.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Unzip tgz and it should have required RPMs with both Open Source and
>>>>>>>> Non-Open Source modules.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> http://www.cloudsand.com/cloudstack-4.3.0-1.tgz
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>>> ilya
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 7/2/14, 1:06 AM, Elliot Berg wrote:
>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I've been putting together a cloudstack set-up for experimentation
>>>>>>>> purposes - right now we're just trying to compare different platforms
>>>>>>>> for private cloud infrastructure before we start getting too in depth
>>>>>>>> with any of them.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I've added the cloudstack 4.2 apt repository, and I'm running on
>>>>>>>> Ubuntu 12.04 LTS, and I believe I've followed all the installation
>>>>>>>> guides correctly at the various stages.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> We've set up a management server, which is also an NFS server, however
>>>>>>>> we're interested in using local storage for the majority of things,
>>>>>>>> and have also set up a single KVM host which I believe is all
>>>>>>>> configured correctly to use local storage. If I look at the dashboard,
>>>>>>>> I'm told I have more than enough resource in every section to create
>>>>>>>> an instance the size I want to - which is a small offering I've
>>>>>>>> created with just 1.0GHz and 1GB of RAM, with local storage. The
>>>>>>>> host's not very powerful, but according to the dashboard I am using
>>>>>>>> 1.50GHz/5.87GHz, 1.38GB/7.80GB, 3.55GB/285.95GB Secondary Storage,
>>>>>>>> 1.03GB/450.99GB Local Storage and 0.00KB/571.90GB Primary Storage (I'm
>>>>>>>> assuming that's meant to be a combination of the NFS server's primary
>>>>>>>> storage offering and the local storage on the host, though the numbers
>>>>>>>> don't quite make sense at first glance).
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> However, when I try to add an instance, I receive an
>>>>>>>> InsufficientServerCapacityException and I'm struggling to work out
>>>>>>>> why. I can't add an instance using a small shared storage offering
>>>>>>>> either, but if I'm not mistaken that's expected because the zone and
>>>>>>>> host are configured to use local storage. The only thing I can think
>>>>>>>> of is that the local storage isn't properly configured, but when I've
>>>>>>>> looked it seems to be.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Any pointers for how I can further diagnose this would be great -
>>>>>>>> thanks in advance!
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Elliot
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>
>>
>>
