Yes mark the VR to stopped, destroy VR, mark the VR entry in op_it_work to “Done” and try deploying VM.
-Harikrishna On 08-Jul-2014, at 12:44 pm, Elliot Berg <elliot.b...@avcosystems.com> wrote: > Hi, > > It appears to be stuck in the "starting" state - so I don't get the option to > reboot it or anything. If I change the state to stopped in the database > directly will the management server attempt to start it again or do I need to > do something more? > > Thanks! > > Elliot > > Harikrishna Patnala wrote: >> Is your Virtual Router up and running ? If is in running state you can mark >> it Done and deploy a VM. >> If it is in stopped state try restarting it. You can try updating the field >> as well. >> >> -Harikrishna >> >> On 07-Jul-2014, at 7:10 pm, Elliot Berg<elliot.b...@avcosystems.com> wrote: >> >>> I can see two entries that have the "step" field set to something other >>> than "Done", one of them is >>> >>> ConsoleProxy | Starting >>> >>> and the other is >>> >>> DomainRouter | Prepare >>> >>> Am I safe to just delete the rows, or should I just update the field? >>> >>> Thanks, >>> >>> Elliot >>> >>> Harikrishna Patnala wrote: >>>> Do you see any work item pending for Virtual Router r-4-VM in “op_it_work” >>>> table ? >>>> If there are any, remove those entries and try VM deployment again. >>>> >>>> I see in the logs that VR has a task pending >>>> 2014-07-07 10:28:15,934 WARN [cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl] >>>> (Job-Executor-5:job-48 = [ 22369802-b5aa-4b5a-a26d-1fab11241551 ]) The >>>> task item for vm VM[DomainRouter|r-4-VM] has been inactive for 418531 >>>> >>>> >>>> -Harikrishna >>>> >>>> >>>> On 07-Jul-2014, at 2:18 pm, Elliot >>>> Berg<elliot.b...@avcosystems.com<mailto:elliot.b...@avcosystems.com>> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>> I'm still not really spotting anything indicating why it's not using the >>>> host, but I suspect that's just because I don't really know what I'm >>>> looking for - so I've zipped the whole log for today and stuffed it on >>>> dropbox at >>>> https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/47728104/management-server.log.gz. >>>> >>>> Hopefully someone who's used cloudstack a lot more will have more success! >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> >>>> Elliot >>>> >>>> >>>> Elliot Berg wrote: >>>> I'm going back over everything and I've noticed something else - >>>> everywhere I've looked for how to use local storage says I should change >>>> two global settings; >>>> >>>> >>>> * system.vm.use.local.storage = true >>>> * use.local.storage = true >>>> >>>> However I'm looking at my global settings and only the first exists (which >>>> I have set to true). >>>> >>>> Elliot >>>> >>>> Elliot Berg wrote: >>>> Ah, so when looking back a bit further before (I was kind of only looking >>>> for exceptions higher up before now), I've just spotted this... >>>> >>>> 2014-07-03 10:48:28,765 DEBUG [allocator.impl.FirstFitAllocator] >>>> (Job-Executor-3:job-46 = [ 92fb959d-edc5-4fe2-84a0-5 >>>> 6001226e4ac ] FirstFitRoutingAllocator) Looking for speed=1000Mhz, Ram=1024 >>>> 2014-07-03 10:48:28,765 DEBUG [allocator.impl.FirstFitAllocator] >>>> (Job-Executor-3:job-46 = [ 92fb959d-edc5-4fe2-84a0-5 >>>> 6001226e4ac ] FirstFitRoutingAllocator) Host name: cloudstack-host1, >>>> hostId: 1 is in avoid set, skipping this and try >>>> ing other available hosts >>>> >>>> That's the one and only host - so I'm guessing that has something to do >>>> with it! >>>> >>>> Elliot >>>> -- >>>> Elliot Berg | Analyst Programmer/Network Team >>>> Email: elliot.b...@avcosystems.com<mailto:elliot.b...@avcosystems.com> >>>> | Tel: 01753 213700 | Web: >>>> www.avcosystems.com<http://www.avcosystems.com/> >>>> <image.png> >>>> >>>> Avco Systems Ltd, Registered in England& Wales, Registration Number >>>> 1976620 >>>> Registered Office: Avco Systems | 17 Bath Road | Slough | SL1 3UF >>>> >>>> >>>> ilya musayev wrote: >>>> Elliot, >>>> >>>> When you see such an error - there usually a predecessor message that says >>>> CloudStack checked for X, Y and Z and found no suitable resources based on >>>> your configuration. >>>> >>>> Put the logs on pastebin or some other site (strip out any private info >>>> you dont want to share). I would also recommend cloudstack 4.3.1 (which >>>> is not officially out yet) but should come thru in the next several weeks. >>>> Its latest stable release of CloudStack 4.3.0 - with latest bug fixes. >>>> >>>> I've put a build for folks who want to try it out until we complete >>>> official release of ACS 4.3.1 process. >>>> >>>> Unzip tgz and it should have required RPMs with both Open Source and >>>> Non-Open Source modules. >>>> >>>> http://www.cloudsand.com/cloudstack-4.3.0-1.tgz >>>> >>>> Regards >>>> ilya >>>> >>>> >>>> On 7/2/14, 1:06 AM, Elliot Berg wrote: >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> I've been putting together a cloudstack set-up for experimentation >>>> purposes - right now we're just trying to compare different platforms for >>>> private cloud infrastructure before we start getting too in depth with any >>>> of them. >>>> >>>> I've added the cloudstack 4.2 apt repository, and I'm running on Ubuntu >>>> 12.04 LTS, and I believe I've followed all the installation guides >>>> correctly at the various stages. >>>> >>>> We've set up a management server, which is also an NFS server, however >>>> we're interested in using local storage for the majority of things, and >>>> have also set up a single KVM host which I believe is all configured >>>> correctly to use local storage. If I look at the dashboard, I'm told I >>>> have more than enough resource in every section to create an instance the >>>> size I want to - which is a small offering I've created with just 1.0GHz >>>> and 1GB of RAM, with local storage. The host's not very powerful, but >>>> according to the dashboard I am using 1.50GHz/5.87GHz, 1.38GB/7.80GB, >>>> 3.55GB/285.95GB Secondary Storage, 1.03GB/450.99GB Local Storage and >>>> 0.00KB/571.90GB Primary Storage (I'm assuming that's meant to be a >>>> combination of the NFS server's primary storage offering and the local >>>> storage on the host, though the numbers don't quite make sense at first >>>> glance). >>>> >>>> However, when I try to add an instance, I receive an >>>> InsufficientServerCapacityException and I'm struggling to work out why. I >>>> can't add an instance using a small shared storage offering either, but if >>>> I'm not mistaken that's expected because the zone and host are configured >>>> to use local storage. The only thing I can think of is that the local >>>> storage isn't properly configured, but when I've looked it seems to be. >>>> >>>> Any pointers for how I can further diagnose this would be great - thanks >>>> in advance! >>>> >>>> Elliot >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >> >> >>
