Do you see any work item pending for Virtual Router r-4-VM in “op_it_work”
table ?
If there are any, remove those entries and try VM deployment again.
I see in the logs that VR has a task pending
2014-07-07 10:28:15,934 WARN [cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl]
(Job-Executor-5:job-48 = [ 22369802-b5aa-4b5a-a26d-1fab11241551 ]) The task
item for vm VM[DomainRouter|r-4-VM] has been inactive for 418531
-Harikrishna
On 07-Jul-2014, at 2:18 pm, Elliot
Berg<elliot.b...@avcosystems.com<mailto:elliot.b...@avcosystems.com>> wrote:
I'm still not really spotting anything indicating why it's not using the host,
but I suspect that's just because I don't really know what I'm looking for - so
I've zipped the whole log for today and stuffed it on dropbox at
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/47728104/management-server.log.gz.
Hopefully someone who's used cloudstack a lot more will have more success!
Thanks,
Elliot
Elliot Berg wrote:
I'm going back over everything and I've noticed something else - everywhere
I've looked for how to use local storage says I should change two global
settings;
* system.vm.use.local.storage = true
* use.local.storage = true
However I'm looking at my global settings and only the first exists (which I
have set to true).
Elliot
Elliot Berg wrote:
Ah, so when looking back a bit further before (I was kind of only looking for
exceptions higher up before now), I've just spotted this...
2014-07-03 10:48:28,765 DEBUG [allocator.impl.FirstFitAllocator]
(Job-Executor-3:job-46 = [ 92fb959d-edc5-4fe2-84a0-5
6001226e4ac ] FirstFitRoutingAllocator) Looking for speed=1000Mhz, Ram=1024
2014-07-03 10:48:28,765 DEBUG [allocator.impl.FirstFitAllocator]
(Job-Executor-3:job-46 = [ 92fb959d-edc5-4fe2-84a0-5
6001226e4ac ] FirstFitRoutingAllocator) Host name: cloudstack-host1, hostId: 1
is in avoid set, skipping this and try
ing other available hosts
That's the one and only host - so I'm guessing that has something to do with it!
Elliot
--
Elliot Berg | Analyst Programmer/Network Team
Email: elliot.b...@avcosystems.com<mailto:elliot.b...@avcosystems.com> | Tel:
01753 213700 | Web: www.avcosystems.com<http://www.avcosystems.com/>
<image.png>
Avco Systems Ltd, Registered in England& Wales, Registration Number 1976620
Registered Office: Avco Systems | 17 Bath Road | Slough | SL1 3UF
ilya musayev wrote:
Elliot,
When you see such an error - there usually a predecessor message that says
CloudStack checked for X, Y and Z and found no suitable resources based on your
configuration.
Put the logs on pastebin or some other site (strip out any private info you
dont want to share). I would also recommend cloudstack 4.3.1 (which is not
officially out yet) but should come thru in the next several weeks. Its latest
stable release of CloudStack 4.3.0 - with latest bug fixes.
I've put a build for folks who want to try it out until we complete official
release of ACS 4.3.1 process.
Unzip tgz and it should have required RPMs with both Open Source and Non-Open
Source modules.
http://www.cloudsand.com/cloudstack-4.3.0-1.tgz
Regards
ilya
On 7/2/14, 1:06 AM, Elliot Berg wrote:
Hi,
I've been putting together a cloudstack set-up for experimentation purposes -
right now we're just trying to compare different platforms for private cloud
infrastructure before we start getting too in depth with any of them.
I've added the cloudstack 4.2 apt repository, and I'm running on Ubuntu 12.04
LTS, and I believe I've followed all the installation guides correctly at the
various stages.
We've set up a management server, which is also an NFS server, however we're
interested in using local storage for the majority of things, and have also set
up a single KVM host which I believe is all configured correctly to use local
storage. If I look at the dashboard, I'm told I have more than enough resource
in every section to create an instance the size I want to - which is a small
offering I've created with just 1.0GHz and 1GB of RAM, with local storage. The
host's not very powerful, but according to the dashboard I am using
1.50GHz/5.87GHz, 1.38GB/7.80GB, 3.55GB/285.95GB Secondary Storage,
1.03GB/450.99GB Local Storage and 0.00KB/571.90GB Primary Storage (I'm assuming
that's meant to be a combination of the NFS server's primary storage offering
and the local storage on the host, though the numbers don't quite make sense at
first glance).
However, when I try to add an instance, I receive an
InsufficientServerCapacityException and I'm struggling to work out why. I can't
add an instance using a small shared storage offering either, but if I'm not
mistaken that's expected because the zone and host are configured to use local
storage. The only thing I can think of is that the local storage isn't properly
configured, but when I've looked it seems to be.
Any pointers for how I can further diagnose this would be great - thanks in
advance!
Elliot
