> So let’s have all these laudables contribute to CoolBeans (put that page back 
> up Emilian and link to it in this thread) and then let’s have CoolBeans use 
> that pile if cash to sponsor NetCAT 12.0 participation!

First, I assume the bellow was written in jest:

>  $50 per person per NetCAT test spec

I see there are about 200 test specs according to
https://netbeans-vm.apache.org/synergy/client/app/#/specifications so
is anybody really donating such substantial sums of money?

Note that for CoolBeans (now OpenBeans, heh), I would have charged
money via my company. Then paid a salary to me or cover other project
expenses. I don't have a foundation that could give cash grants to
external individuals. Even so, I suspect just drafting the legal
paperwork for such a situation and clearing things up with the
accountant would cost more than the actual donations.

--emi


On Fri, Mar 13, 2020 at 10:34 PM Geertjan Wielenga <geert...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> So let’s have all these laudables contribute to CoolBeans (put that page back 
> up Emilian and link to it in this thread) and then let’s have CoolBeans use 
> that pile if cash to sponsor NetCAT 12.0 participation!
>
> Gj
>
> On Fri, 13 Mar 2020 at 21:28, Emilian Bold <emilian.b...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> You guys are laudable!
>>
>> Back in late 2018 when I launched CoolBeans I also put up a store page
>> as I imagined it was possible to get paid working on NetBeans codebase
>> itself. (BTW, no third party can sell "NetBeans" since it's an Apache
>> trademark!)
>>
>> Incorporated entities did use CoolBeans but not once bought a license!
>> I did get a formal request via SoftChoice (aka procurement) which
>> involved a lot of back and forth and changes before they could buy
>> exactly 0 licenses.
>>
>> I also tried paying for features myself via bounties
>> https://www.openbeans.org/bounties/ but nobody claimed one.
>>
>> Really curious what the conclusion of this talk is and what solution is 
>> found.
>>
>> My opinion is that there is no money in NetBeans (excluding some
>> legacy Platform apps still going) and even when people want to pay
>> other requirements are not met and the deal fails.
>>
>> It would be cool to have a Tomitribe for NetBeans, but... there is no
>> market for IDE subscriptions.
>>
>> --emi
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Mar 13, 2020 at 9:53 PM John G. Weed <nonsequi...@fastmail.com> 
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > I'd be more than happy to contribute some cash to the appropriately formed 
>> > company, either directly or in some form of licensing agreent. I'd also be 
>> > willing to offer some time, though my expertise is limited to c/c++.
>> >
>> > Sincerely,
>> >
>> > John .G Weed
>> > Cicero Systems, LLC
>> > "Reason. Resolve. Respond"
>> > (571) 277-9998
>> >
>> > "Steal a man's reputation for probity, and the more shrewd and clever he 
>> > is, the more hated and mistrusted he'll become." Marcus Tullius Cicero 
>> > (106BC-43BC)
>> >
>> > Confidentiality Notice:  The information contained in this electronic 
>> > transmission is privileged and confidential and is intended only for the 
>> > recipient(s) named above.  If the reader of this message is not the 
>> > recipient(s) named above, or an authorized agent of such recipient(s) 
>> > responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient(s), you are hereby 
>> > notified that you have received this electronic transmission in error.  
>> > Any review, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this electronic 
>> > transmission including any attachments is strictly prohibited.  If you 
>> > have received this electronic transmission in error, please notify the 
>> > sender immediately.
>> >
>> >
>> > On Fri, Mar 13, 2020, at 15:33, Thomas Wolf wrote:
>> >
>> > I'd be happy to contribute some personal money.  To get my employer to 
>> > pay, it would have to take the form of something like an IDE license or 
>> > support license.  Many engineers in my company use IntelliJ and the 
>> > company pays for those licenses - I don't see why they wouldn't pay for a 
>> > Netbeans "license" for me as long as they have an official place from 
>> > which to 'purchase' it.
>> >
>> > Best regards,
>> > Tom
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > On Fri, Mar 13, 2020 at 3:22 PM Geertjan Wielenga <geert...@apache.org> 
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> > Sure! If you’re not willing/able to participate in NetCAT yourself:
>> >
>> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/NetCAT+12.0
>> >
>> > ...would you be interested in sponsoring others to do so, at say $50 per 
>> > person per NetCAT test spec?
>> >
>> > Gj
>> >
>> > On Fri, 13 Mar 2020 at 20:01, Chris Olsen <col...@mchsi.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > Thomas and All --
>> >
>> >    Mine is much the same story.  Would there be some way to contribute $$$ 
>> > (or, in my case, $$) to the team meaningfully?
>> >
>> >   -- Chris
>> >
>> > ----- Original Message -----
>> > From: Thomas Wolf <tjw...@gmail.com>
>> > To: John Mc <mcdonnell.j...@gmail.com>
>> > Cc: Robert Erdt <rob.e...@charter.net>, bmelen...@hemstech.com, Geertjan 
>> > Wielenga <geert...@apache.org>, Emilian Bold <emilian.b...@gmail.com>, 
>> > Paul Szudzik <pszud...@throwarock.com>, Netbeans Mailing List 
>> > <users@netbeans.apache.org>
>> > Sent: Fri, 13 Mar 2020 14:10:11 -0400 (EDT)
>> > Subject: Re: Statement of disappointment
>> >
>> > My $.02,
>> > I’ve been benefitting from NB since I moved over from Visual Cafe in 1999 
>> > (to give you an idea of what a Java dinosaur I am).  And my only 
>> > contributions in 2+ decades have been bug reports (most of which now lie 
>> > forgotten somewhere in the bowels of the old Bugzilla system) and 1-2 
>> > NetCAT participations.   I have always been willing to pay for this 
>> > excellent tool but never had the desire (or time) to improve it myself.   
>> > In the early days, I once downloaded it with the faint hope of correcting 
>> > a minor bug - but didn’t even succeed in building it.   For me at least, 
>> > the time it takes to get high enough on the learning curve to contribute 
>> > meaningfully is more than I have been willing to invest (maybe that’ll 
>> > change after I retire in a few years).
>> >
>> > But like I said, I’ve always been more than happy to pay for the tool.  I 
>> > wonder if it’s too late for NB to introduce such an alternative/additional 
>> > model?   Just a thought.
>> >
>> > Best regards,
>> > Tom
>> >
>> >
>> > > On Mar 13, 2020, at 9:51 AM, John Mc <mcdonnell.j...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > >
>> > > 
>> > > But instead of looking at this financial payment, why not consider an 
>> > > time/effort payment?
>> > >
>> > > At present, I cant really talk, I've been busy, and have provided 
>> > > anything back to NetBeans in a while but then I don't have any issues 
>> > > that are negatively effecting me.  If and when I do I will hopefully try 
>> > > to address them, like I have tried to in the past.
>> > >
>> > > The way I see it, if we could find out what exactly is blocking people 
>> > > from moving to 11.3/12, and then if they can spend even a small amount 
>> > > of time/effort into looking at these we can get to an even better 
>> > > NetBeans product.
>> > >
>> > > John
>> > >
>> > >> On Fri, 13 Mar 2020 at 13:34, Robert Erdt <rob.e...@charter.net> wrote:
>> > >> Agreed, NetBeans is worth paying for....
>> > >>
>> > >> I am with Bill, I have not upgraded and I am at 9 similar to 8.
>> > >>
>> > >> Rob
>> > >>
>> > >> -----Original Message-----
>> > >> From: bmelen...@hemstech.com [mailto:bmelen...@hemstech.com]
>> > >> Sent: Friday, March 13, 2020 9:30 AM
>> > >> To: Geertjan Wielenga <geert...@apache.org>
>> > >> Cc: Emilian Bold <emilian.b...@gmail.com>; Paul Szudzik 
>> > >> <pszud...@throwarock.com>; Netbeans Mailing List 
>> > >> <users@netbeans.apache.org>
>> > >> Subject: Re: Statement of disappointment
>> > >>
>> > >> All:
>> > >>
>> > >> Been reading all the emails on the NB migration. I do JAVA on NB 8.0.2 
>> > >> platform and have not upgraded due to the issues being address. I do 
>> > >> okay with the NB 8. If this is so critical for getting program done for 
>> > >> clients, then one should be willing to pay for the platform. See it as 
>> > >> a business expense and write it off at tax time. Normally, tools are 
>> > >> included in the cost of a job -so I'm miffed as to the expectations 
>> > >> placing the onus on NB development to resolve things at no cost. NB is 
>> > >> a great platform and this is merely a transitional period for it, so I 
>> > >> stay with my current platform and wait until the dust settles --or pay 
>> > >> for the upgrade with support if my situation changes. While NB has many 
>> > >> issues, it will eventually resolve the main ones or become a dust 
>> > >> covered relic with passing memories.
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >> Bill
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >> > Indeed, I think the approach Emilian suggests is the way to go. And,
>> > >> > indeed, if you don't want to or have the time to move to Maven of
>> > >> > Gradle, then a lot of modern options start closing off to you.
>> > >> >
>> > >> > But, on a different level, for a lot of users of NetBeans, the
>> > >> > chickens have come home to roost: a free and open source project, such
>> > >> > as NetBeans, should never simply have been 'used', it should always
>> > >> > have been invested in. For example, simply filing a bug and hoping
>> > >> > someone will turn up to fix it has never been the way open source is
>> > >> > meant to work.
>> > >> >
>> > >> > Nothing is ever free -- either you spend time (in understanding how
>> > >> > NetBeans works, for example) or money (in paying JetBrains, for
>> > >> > example, and then you have engineers creating IntelliJ IDEA for you).
>> > >> > Not spending anything at all and hoping things will work out for you
>> > >> > has never been a sustainable approach.
>> > >> >
>> > >> > Gjj
>> > >> >
>> > >> > On Mon, Mar 9, 2020 at 4:24 PM Emilian Bold <emilian.b...@gmail.com>
>> > >> > wrote:
>> > >> >
>> > >> >> Go and pick Azul Zulu' JDK FX package which comes bundles with 
>> > >> >> JavaFX:
>> > >> >>
>> > >> >> https://www.azul.com/downloads/zulu-community/?&architecture=x86-64-b
>> > >> >> it&package=jdk-fx
>> > >> >>
>> > >> >> I used it for an older Platform app where I don't feel like
>> > >> >> configuring the FX mumbo jumbo.
>> > >> >>
>> > >> >> I doubt anybody can make a magic transition tools since there's too
>> > >> >> much people can customize...
>> > >> >>
>> > >> >> Given the resources available, things are as they are. They could
>> > >> >> always be better.
>> > >> >>
>> > >> >> --emi
>> > >> >>
>> > >> >> On Mon, Mar 9, 2020 at 5:16 PM Paul Szudzik <pszud...@throwarock.com>
>> > >> >> wrote:
>> > >> >> >
>> > >> >> >     I have been a NetBeans user since inception.  I am retired now,
>> > >> >> but
>> > >> >> when I worked, I was one of the few people in my company that was an
>> > >> >> advocate of NetBeans, and used it instead of the company line,
>> > >> >> Eclipse product.
>> > >> >> >
>> > >> >> >     Retired now for 10+ years, I used NetBeans to develop my
>> > >> >> > products,
>> > >> >> and really getting involved in JavaFX big time. I love the cross
>> > >> >> platform capability, and use it on both Ubuntu and Windows.
>> > >> >> Raspberry Pi, no problem.  Windows, no problem.  I loved it. Then
>> > >> >> boom, Oracle takes JavaFX out of the mix, and NetBeans and I start
>> > >> >> having major problems. It gets harder and harder to use NetBeans with
>> > >> >> it’s incompatibility with JavaFX without going through hoops every
>> > >> >> single time we upgrade.  I have a ton of projects that are a major
>> > >> >> pain to go back to without having to dance on a high wire to get to
>> > >> >> work.  And I am still not sure I can do this anymore.
>> > >> >> >
>> > >> >> >     I have been a computer programmer, designer and architect for
>> > >> >> > well
>> > >> >> over 53+ years.  I have see many systems come and go, many IDE rise
>> > >> >> and fall, many languages surface and crash.  The move to Maven is
>> > >> >> beyond my scope now.  I want to program, not to have to regenerate
>> > >> >> and rehash my build system every release.  I have tried to move over
>> > >> >> to 11, and mostly failed.  I have too many modules and programs in 
>> > >> >> play to hack this out.
>> > >> >> >
>> > >> >> >     It would have been great if NetBeans had a seamless transition
>> > >> >> > ,
>> > >> >> built in conversions for old projects to current format.  Seriously,
>> > >> >> I would love to be on that train.  But nope, it seems too much
>> > >> >> handholding and dancing.  I currently have a half dozen active
>> > >> >> Beta’s  that are stuck in a NetBeans 8.1.x / Java 8 scenario, that
>> > >> >> I want to port into NetBeans
>> > >> >> 11.3 / Java 13+ area, but really don’t believe that it is 1: Easy, 
>> > >> >> 2:
>> > >> >> Lasting, 3: Enduring more than another release.
>> > >> >> >
>> > >> >> >     I still have reported bugs > 5 years old that are not resolved.
>> > >> >> >
>> > >> >> >     I see streams of notes that are asking questions about
>> > >> >> compatibility.  ( The latest straw is the Ant image ... )  I see how
>> > >> >> once the major players in NetBeans get on a wagon, the trail off is
>> > >> >> almost impossible.  If you’re new to NetBeans, perhaps this is a
>> > >> >> good trend.
>> > >> >> If
>> > >> >> you have dealt with NetBeans as long as I have.. it becomes more than
>> > >> >> just an annoyance.  It almost easier to find another IDE to settle in
>> > >> >> on, as the amount of work to transfer 100+ projects, probably more,
>> > >> >> from old NetBeans to new NetBeans is formidable.
>> > >> >> >
>> > >> >> >     Maybe a 3rd party can produce a product that 100% transfer old
>> > >> >> projects to Maven..  I’d rather develop and code than mess around
>> > >> >> with trying to make things move up the NetBeans chain anymore..
>> > >> >> Coding is fun, transitioning is not. I am 100% committed to JavaFX, I
>> > >> >> like the layouts, I like what Gluon has done, I like the look and
>> > >> >> feel.
>> > >> >> >
>> > >> >> >     NetBeans 8 –> NetBeans 11+ –> convert ...
>> > >> >> >
>> > >> >> >     I would normally apologize for my rant, but nope. I feel that I
>> > >> >> > am
>> > >> >> now progressing backwards...
>> > >> >> >
>> > >> >> >
>> > >> >> >
>> > >> >>
>> > >> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > >> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@netbeans.apache.org
>> > >> >> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@netbeans.apache.org
>> > >> >>
>> > >> >> For further information about the NetBeans mailing lists, visit:
>> > >> >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Mailing+lists
>> > >> >>
>> > >> >>
>> > >> >
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >> Bill Melendez, Founder & CEO, MBA
>> > >> HEMS Technology
>> > >> www.hemstech.com
>> > >> www.linkedin.com/in/billmelendez
>> > >> bmelen...@hemstech.com
>> > >> 817-932-0047
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@netbeans.apache.org
>> > >> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@netbeans.apache.org
>> > >>
>> > >> For further information about the NetBeans mailing lists, visit:
>> > >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Mailing+lists
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@netbeans.apache.org
>> > >> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@netbeans.apache.org
>> > >>
>> > >> For further information about the NetBeans mailing lists, visit:
>> > >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Mailing+lists
>> > >>
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > tjw...@gmail.com
>> > http://landofwolf.blogspot.com/
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@netbeans.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@netbeans.apache.org
>>
>> For further information about the NetBeans mailing lists, visit:
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Mailing+lists
>>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@netbeans.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@netbeans.apache.org

For further information about the NetBeans mailing lists, visit:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Mailing+lists

Reply via email to