Larry Gusaas wrote:
Rob Clement wrote:
Larry Gusaas wrote:
Hedley Finger wrote:

Larry:

The hardware problem is irrelevant. The AutoRecovery feature is there to prevent loss of data when there is a *hardware* [??!?!!!] or software failure.

Full auto-recovery implies that somewhere all the data in a file at the point of a crash is somehow stored somewhere whence it can be retrieved. What and where is this somewhere, pray?
<clip/>

Read the bug report. AutoRecovery is broken.
http://qa.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=92968

On my system I have my preferences set to "Save AutoRecovery information every 5 minutes". If I work on a document for an hour and my system crashes, when I reopen OO.o it will ask me if I want recover document. When it does so, instead of using the data saved every five minutes it opens the last manually saved version of my document and a hour of my work will have been lost.

Is that clear now?

Read the original rant from the user. he had this problem of his power supply in version 2 of openoffice and when OOo 3.0 auto recovery failed he blamed OOo auto recovery and not his power supply problem.

I did. He had a power failure. He lost data because AutoRecovery in OO.o 3 is broken.

I agree fix OOo auto recovery. but power supply is quicker to fix and easier then to find out how much of a problem the software is.

The problem in OO.o 3.0 was caused by a regression. It has been located and fixed and will be in the next release. We should all be thankful that this problem has been reported so we can remember to manually save very frequently since we now know that AutoRecovery does not work.

Now why don't you quit sounding like the defence lawyer for a rapist who is constantly trying to blame the victim.

Larry

Which is quicker - to fix a local problem with power to your pc or to fix OOo? That is my point - speed of response.

Rob

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to