At 16:09 16/05/2009 -0700, Gary Noop wrote:
My apologies.
Oh, absolutely none necessary! (Sorry if I gave any different impression.)
My response wasn't intended to deem your contribution useless.
Indeed. But I still insist that the enquirer - or anyone else - is
entitled to think so if they wish! ;^)
But I am amazed that someone would have to go to all the trouble of
downloading 52MB of viewer/converter [1] simply to open and view a
"modern" word processing document.
Quite so.
What I perhaps should have made clearer is that my suggestion was in
the nature of a workaround - just something that I had discovered
which worked. And that the implication of your earlier advice (which
I have now read again) - that problems such as this are best attacked
at the source rather than at the destination, by the careful choice
of appropriate formats for distribution of documents - is, of course, spot on.
Brian Barker
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@openoffice.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@openoffice.org
