-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
Christopher X. Candreva writes: > On Wed, 29 Sep 2004, Keith Hackworth wrote: > > > I ran into this too and I emailed the developer for this module about > > this. I haven't seen a response yet. I fixed it by modifying his perl > > Well, he responded to almost immediately when I mailed him ast night > (actually about 2:00 AM EDT ), and I gave him the correct syntax for > hostname on Solaris. He sounded like this was the first he had heard about > it. > > However, perhaps given the importance of SA and the symplicity of what this > does, SA might want to just not use this module and do something else -- > even ask for the FQDN in the configure part, when it asks for the e-mail > address to use and the other questions. > > Looking at the code for S::H::L -- it seems like overkill for such a simple > function -- rather than decide at install time what system it is and install > the proper code, each time it is called is tries to detect what kind of > system it is on and do the appropriate thing. Also, hostname is called > without any kind of path, replying on the setting of $PATH > > The more I think about it I think SA should just drop the module and do > something else. we don't. we use a module, that uses a module, that uses it. - --j. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Exmh CVS iD8DBQFBWwtLQTcbUG5Y7woRAly/AKDam+TysriUudbn/zS1yvFryyt92gCgtl4O MwJBKijJETSSmoJ7CUlHp2I= =xzxs -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
