On 16/07/2020 14:47, jdow wrote: > You can probably fork the project and go on running what exists now going > forward. That is something I am mulling doing for myself. I just have to ask > myself, which is more painful?
Actually, might not have to reinvent the wheel, last time I looked at rspamd was several years ago. Since the politically motivated change in spamassassin was made public last week, I reinstalled it in a dev lab. Running over the weekend, tests showed rspamd has remarkably improved, 603% speed increase over spamassassin (well it does run in C), and 18% more hit rates, when it came to known false positives, it equalled spamassassin though. Obviously before moving production over to it, I need to run it again over a much longer period of time, but it looks promising, I'll see it how goes over the next 4 weeks. -- Regards, Noel Butler This Email, including attachments, may contain legally privileged information, therefore at all times remains confidential and subject to copyright protected under international law. You may not disseminate this message without the authors express written authority to do so. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender then delete all copies of this message including attachments immediately. Confidentiality, copyright, and legal privilege are not waived or lost by reason of the mistaken delivery of this message.
