> On Jul 19, 2020, at 10:12 PM, Noel Butler <noel.but...@ausics.net> wrote: > > On 16/07/2020 14:47, jdow wrote: > >> >> You can probably fork the project and go on running what exists now going >> forward. That is something I am mulling doing for myself. I just have to ask >> myself, which is more painful? >> >> > > Actually, might not have to reinvent the wheel, last time I looked at rspamd > was several years ago. > > Since the politically motivated change in spamassassin was made public last > week, I reinstalled it in a dev lab. Running over the weekend, tests showed > rspamd has remarkably improved, 603% speed increase over spamassassin (well > it does run in C), and 18% more hit rates, when it came to known false > positives, it equalled spamassassin though. > > Obviously before moving production over to it, I need to run it again over a > much longer period of time, but it looks promising, I'll see it how goes over > the next 4 weeks. >
Yes, but what if they choose to use inclusive language? Then where do you go to avoid this oppression? > > -- > > Regards, > Noel Butler > > This Email, including attachments, may contain legally privileged > information, therefore at all times remains confidential and subject to > copyright protected under international law. You may not disseminate this > message without the authors express written authority to do so. If you are > not the intended recipient, please notify the sender then delete all copies > of this message including attachments immediately. Confidentiality, > copyright, and legal privilege are not waived or lost by reason of the > mistaken delivery of this message. >
