On Mon, 2020-07-20 at 09:30 -0700, John Hardin wrote: > It would be helpful if we could be informed whether anyone has post- > SA processing that looks for these rulenames in the SA hit results, > e.g. for making message delivery decisions. > Repeating previously posted info for completeness: one of my private rules uses URIBL_BLACK as a subrule. I have no other potential conflicts with SA rule name changes and no postprocessing that's dependent on SA rule names.
Martin
