On Wed, April 23, 2008 02:03, Theo Van Dinter wrote: > fwiw, generally speaking, a uribl whitelist is just a list of domains > that shouldn't be blacklisted. it does not imply a list of domains that > should be considered non-spam and therefore gain negative points from > SA via some not-currently-existant rule.
yep i know that, but i more like to have uribl whitelist as a uridnsbl_skip_domain list, imho it makes more sense atleast for me :) > there's really nothing stopping spammers from putting in amazon.com, > google.com, yahoo.com, etc. and they can be pretty sure these domains > are whitelisted already by the uribl organizations. https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=5864, its more benefitly to have skip_domains as external, and what are in stok spamassassin by default is not olso listed in any blacklist/whitelist, that is still my point :) Benny Pedersen Need more webspace ? http://www.servage.net/?coupon=cust37098
