it might be worth splitting out a new type of bounce rule -- "OOO_BOUNCE" which matches only OOO messages. if you make a patch I may consider it ;)
--j. On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 16:38, Michael Scheidell <scheid...@secnap.net> wrote: > > > Karsten Bräckelmann wrote: > > On Thu, 2009-01-29 at 09:47 -0500, Michael Scheidell wrote: > > > just take out __BOUNCE_OOO_1. its too common in normal emails. > > > Can't you just overwrite this one in local.cf? :) > > > > yes, if I thought it was a 'local' problem only affecting me... that is why > I posted to list. to see if its a common problem. > > > -- > Michael Scheidell, CTO > Phone: 561-999-5000, x 1259 >> | SECNAP Network Security Corporation > > Certified SNORT Integrator > King of Spam Filters, SC Magazine 2008 > Information Security Award 2008, Info Security Products Guide > CRN Magazine Top 40 Emerging Security Vendors > Finalist 2009 Network Products Guide Hot Companies > > ________________________________ > > This email has been scanned and certified safe by SpammerTrap(R). > For Information please see www.secnap.com/products/spammertrap/ > > ________________________________ >
