On Thu, 2009-01-29 at 11:38 -0500, Michael Scheidell wrote:
> Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
> > On Thu, 2009-01-29 at 09:47 -0500, Michael Scheidell wrote:
> > > just take out __BOUNCE_OOO_1. its too common in normal emails.
> >
> > Can't you just overwrite this one in local.cf? :)
>
> yes, if I thought it was a 'local' problem only affecting me... that
> is why I posted to list. to see if its a common problem.
Ah, yeah, that was merely meant as a quick hint for the records how to
work around it -- in case someone else who has the same problem reads
this. :)
Haven't had a close look at the bounces in a while, so I can't say much
about my corpus. However, by a quick glimpse I don't get many of these.
Most of my OoO notices seem to slip by that VBounce rule.
Also, Justin now removed the offending sub-test from VBounce in trunk
due to repeated FP reports. RESOLVED FIXED. :)
--
char *t="\10pse\0r\0dtu...@ghno\x4e\xc8\x79\xf4\xab\x51\x8a\x10\xf4\xf4\xc4";
main(){ char h,m=h=*t++,*x=t+2*h,c,i,l=*x,s=0; for (i=0;i<l;i++){ i%8? c<<=1:
(c=*++x); c&128 && (s+=h); if (!(h>>=1)||!t[s+h]){ putchar(t[s]);h=m;s=0; }}}
