Karsten Bräckelmann wrote on Fri, 30 Jan 2009 19:42:16 +0100: > FWIW, and to make Michael happy, I just caught one today -- hit another > rule, __BOUNCE_OOO_3. Sadly, it also hit __BOUNCE_AUTO_REPLY. So there's > more to disable...
why? Why disable a rule because of a few FPs? If that rule isn't scored in any way that makes it a threat that is perfectly acceptable. It's the overall behavior of a rule that makes it worth or not worth using it, not a few FPs. Nobody, at least not me, expects these rules to be free of FPs. Kai -- Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com
