John Hardin wrote: > On Wed, 29 Apr 2009, Jesse Thompson wrote: > >> A word of caution. Be very careful how you use the list. The >> intended usage for the list is to prevent (or monitor) local users >> from sending email to the listed addresses. The phishers frequently >> use compromised end-user accounts to receive the phishing replies, so >> there is a high risk of false positives, especially if you attempt to >> classify messages containing one these addresses as spam. > > Thread fork! > > Would it be useful to have a similar list for 419 fraud contact addresses? > > Discuss... >
That was always my intention - there are a couple of us looking at several methods of automatically listing e-mail addresses present in the body of spam or the Reply-To header to specifically target stuff that often slips though with low scores. I'm also looking at listing URIs that are impossible to list in the traditional URIBLs e.g. groups.yahoo.com/groupname/message/1 Cheers, Steve.
