Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: > On 09.02.10 11:42, dar...@chaosreigns.com wrote: >> I apparently need to clarify that I think this is a good idea because >> I am concerned about the number of people (who control DNS records) >> who are very strongly against creating SPF records specifically >> because of forwarding >> breakage. The email I got in response to my request for my employer >> to >> create an SPF record included the word "abomination". From a friend. >> I don't entirely agree, but it is a problem for adoption. >> >> This is entirely an attempt to replicate the functionality of SPF >> without breaking forwarding, and without causing other problems that >> might discourage adoption. > > Imho, SPF does NOT break forwarding.
Hmm, the SRS people seem to disagree: http://www.openspf.org/SRS : SPF "breaks" email forwarding. /Per Jessen, Zürich
