corpus.defero wrote: > On Thu, 2010-10-07 at 08:56 -1000, Alexandre Chapellon wrote: >> Indeed no IP should be blacklisted undefinitely... at least without >> checking regularily. > I don't agree. An IP that hops on and off lists should stay ON until > the blocklist operator is satisfied that no further abuse will come > from it.
How does that differ from what Alexandre said? > As for SORBS, the easy way to get delisted and quit whining about how > long it takes, is to *not* get listed in the first place. Which is clearly not to get *delisted*, but to avoid having the need to be. > It's really a case of actions have consequences. Not careful in your > output, don't expect any sympathy. Well, in this case, SORBS screwed up royally, so consequence = don't use them? /Per Jessen, Zürich
