corpus.defero wrote: > On Fri, 2010-10-08 at 20:13 +0200, Per Jessen wrote: >> corpus.defero wrote: >> >> > On Thu, 2010-10-07 at 08:56 -1000, Alexandre Chapellon wrote: >> >> Indeed no IP should be blacklisted undefinitely... at least >> >> without checking regularily. >> > I don't agree. An IP that hops on and off lists should stay ON >> > until the blocklist operator is satisfied that no further abuse >> > will come from it. >> >> How does that differ from what Alexandre said? > It differs because I am saying they *should* remain listed forever.
Actually, as far as I can tell, you said "until the blocklist operator is satisfied that no further abuse will come from it" which is clearly not "forever". > Personally if I were running the show I'd seek a large deposit to > remove an IP and any repeat would result in the loss of that deposit > with no further chance to remove the IP until it was clearly and > demonstrably reassigned. I doubt if a list with such a policy would be of much interest to anyone. Just my opinion, of course. /Per Jessen, Zürich
