On Sat, 2010-10-09 at 15:58 +0200, Per Jessen wrote: > corpus.defero wrote: > > > On Fri, 2010-10-08 at 20:13 +0200, Per Jessen wrote: > >> corpus.defero wrote: > >> > >> > On Thu, 2010-10-07 at 08:56 -1000, Alexandre Chapellon wrote: > >> >> Indeed no IP should be blacklisted undefinitely... at least > >> >> without checking regularily. > >> > I don't agree. An IP that hops on and off lists should stay ON > >> > until the blocklist operator is satisfied that no further abuse > >> > will come from it. > >> > >> How does that differ from what Alexandre said? > > It differs because I am saying they *should* remain listed forever. > > Actually, as far as I can tell, you said "until the blocklist operator > is satisfied that no further abuse will come from it" which is clearly > not "forever". No, in my clarification I have been precise and clear and said: "I am saying they *should* remain listed forever"
Really, I cannot be any more exact than that. This is all OT for a Spamassassin. If you want to bitch about blocklists why not do it on SPAM-L or at NANAE?
