On Wed, 01 Dec 2010 13:29:28 -0500 Rob McEwen <r...@invaluement.com> wrote:
> When DNSBL resources are order of magnitudes higher... when the > largest data files for DNSBLs go from 100MB to probably Terabytes... > and then trying to transfer that via rsync... and getting all the > mirrors to handle loading that much data into rbldnsd... THAT will be > a nightmare. (will Terabytes of RAM be affordable anytime soon?) I don't follow you. DNSBLs will only list addresses (actually, /64s) that have been seen to be abusive. That number is limited not by the number of possible IPv6 addresses, but by the number of actual /64 allocations. [...] > We have a chance to impose some strict standards for mail sending on > IPv6 that will lessen these problems. Why wait until its too late? Because those strict standards all make sending mail less convenient without affecting spam. Regards, David.
