Am 26.03.2015 um 13:54 schrieb Reindl Harald:
Solve that problem, and then I agree with you. And saying "well, don't let different end-users have different settings" is not a solution. Neither is "tempfail all recipients but the first so the message is transmitted one time for each recipient."the same way you reject a mail with a invalid recipient and two valid ones - as you can see below spamass-milter anyways get a seperate copy for scanning to change the overall score based on envelopes (from as well as too) based on http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.mail.postfix.user/193456 X-Local-Envelope-From: <reindl.har...@gmail.com> X-Local-Envelope-To: <h.rei...@thelounge.net> Received: from mail-ig0-f171.google.com Message-ID: <caacbkvp4dpczlhodtuvugcfq9pat10yozsaum_7k9ositbo...@mail.gmail.com> X-Local-Envelope-From: <reindl.har...@gmail.com> X-Local-Envelope-To: <ha...@rhsoft.net> Received: from mail-ie0-f177.google.com Message-ID: <caacbkvp4dpczlhodtuvugcfq9pat10yozsaum_7k9ositbo...@mail.gmail.com>
and in fact both messages got a different score because my coampany address is in "MOST_SPAM" and my private one in "MANY_SPAM"
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.1, tag-level=5.5, block-level=8.0 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.1, tag-level=5.5, block-level=8.0
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
