Hi, A followup:
1) has anyone been convicted under 303a StGB for suppressing email during spam filtering? 2) How is rejecting with a 5xx code any less of a "suppression" of the data than silently discarding with a 2xx code? In either case, the recipient does not receive the mail. The fact that the sender is *aware* of the non-receipt is immaterial. I doubt you could escape conviction by calling someone up and saying "I'm going to delete your sensitive data", deleting it, and then claiming "well, he knew I deleted it." Regards, David.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
