On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 7:05 PM, Daniel Shahaf <d...@daniel.shahaf.name> wrote: > Ryan Schmidt wrote on Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 16:59:33 -0600: >> On Jan 18, 2011, at 16:02, Daniela Rivas wrote: >> >> > Ok the correct repository URL was >> > http://localhost/prueba/trunk/index.html, so when I execute in a >> > browser http://localhost/prueba/trunk/index.html, I get the first >> > version of the file that i had, without seeing the changes that i did >> > to the working copy, however the number of the revision has increased, >> > because the commit was successful. >> > >> > http://localhost/prueba/trunk/index.html is the repository, it is not >> > a working copy. >> > >> > It was a mistake to put http://localhost/prueba/index.html in the previous >> > mail. >> >> You mentioned before that you could "svn cat >> http://localhost/prueba/trunk/index.html" and you saw the correct updated >> version of the file. That should confirm that the repository does contain >> the changes. >> >> If you still see the old version when you visit >> http://localhost/prueba/trunk/index.html in a web browser, then >> perhaps your web browser has cached the old version, and you should >> clear the browser's cache. And/or try a different web browser. >> > > Or just press "Refresh" or "Ctrl+F5" or the local equivalent. >
Oh no!!, It is not only to refresh the browser. When i go to the file and see its content executing a "cat /..../prueba/trunk/index.html", I get the older file that i had, this is without doing a svn cat command. Now, I created another local working copy and when i modified the remote working copy, I could updated the local copy using svn update. After I did a virtual host pointing to the local working copy and I got it by the browser. This is no the ideal solution, but at least i can see the page through a browser.. Cheers Marguerite