Chris only pinpointed your former offends and was so kind to translate
the type of it with respect. He was AFAICS not digging into what you
repeatedly post as facts to list.
So, Rob, we got your points [1-4]. Thank You.
And now would you just be so kind and leave us so we can happily close
this long winded thread.
Regards,
Michael
Rob Smeets schrieb:
Chris,
Some of your quotes were made by me but others not by me. To make things
easier for you I've copied my previous post for you. Be bold and answer
them, ok. Don't be afraid or shy. At least I won't bite you. There we go:
I want you to take a close look at the following points I've been making and
tell me which one is a misinformation.
1. Every Tapestry major release is backward incompatible with previous
releases.
2. High profile users and commiters have fled Tapestry to other frameworks
such as Wicket. Namely, Kent Tong, Geoff Longman, the creator of Spindle,
etc. I could name some more. Should I do it?
3. Tapestry has been ditched by www.theserverside.com and replaced with
another webframework.
4. In 7 years of existense of Tapestry, Howard has only been able to train
just a 100 Tapestry users.
What is the misinformation here, Chris? Don't avoid any of them or dilute
them with anything else, please, else I would label you a big coward, which
so far hasn't crossed my mind you are.
Looking forawrd to your bold answers.
Yours friendly,
Rob
On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 10:59 AM, Chris Lewis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Francis (as Rob):
http://www.nabble.com/Re%3A-AW%3A-Getting-Answers-on-the-User-List-p16679523.html
"...not only are high profile Tapestry
users abandoning Tapestry, high profile sites which were using Tapestry
are
also ditching Tapestry..." - *FUD*
http://www.nabble.com/Re%3A-Getting-Answers-on-the-User-List-p16634215.html
"...Tapestry is now just another
dead horse, I'm sorry..." - *Misinformation*
http://www.nabble.com/Re%3A-T5-%285.0.11%29---ready-for-production-deployment-p16348763.html
"I have 2 favorite adjectives about Tapestry 5: Over-engineerd and
Volatile!!' - *FUD*
http://www.nabble.com/Re%3A-How-is-T5-tutorial--p16270907.html
"Go grab Wicket of GWT. It's better documented and questions like what you
asked won't refer you to source code but to a well documented examples.
Above all the users of those lists are far, far more friendly." - *SPAM*
http://www.nabble.com/Re%3A-How-is-T5-tutorial--p16275158.html
"There we go again, when someone raises a legitimate concern he is easily
labeled a Troll" - *Misinformation*. You have no questions, you seek to
incite anger.
"Again, this proves how arrogant
and unfriendly Tapestry mailing list members are." - *FUD +
Misinformation*
http://www.nabble.com/Tapestry-at-my-company-p16122861.html
- *FUD* - This entire situation is probably a lie. If not, validate it.
Provide links to the project company, and personally email me a
technical contact that I can privately consult and verify.
http://www.nabble.com/Newbie-Tapestry-p15893688.html
"I googled and also learnt there is Tapestry 6 in the works which
would also be a whole new beast not compatible with all previous Tapestry
versions." - *Misinformation*. You did no such thing, and you are a
despicable liar.
Rob Smeets wrote:
This person is beyond a troll and has
gone to a concerted effort to spread FUD and mis-information
Petros,
I want you to take a close look at the following points I've been making
and
tell me which one is a misinformation.
1. Every Tapestry major release is backward incompatible with previous
releases.
2. High profile users and commiters have fled Tapestry to other
frameworks
such as Wicket. Namely, Kent Tong, Geoff Longman, etc. I could name some
more. Should I do it?
3. Tapestry has been ditched by Theserverside.com and replaced with
another
webframework.
4. In 7 years of existense of Tapestry Howard has only been able to
train
just a 100 Tapestry users.
What is the misinformation here, Petros?
Yours friendly,
Rob
On 17/04/2008, Petros Petrou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I don't mean to be rude but really...
WHY DO YOU GUYS EVEN REPLY TO THIS GUY
Can't you see how much fun he is having.
By replying to a discussion he is part of, I feel I am his puppet and
my
job
is to keep entertaining him. This is what we are all doing by
reploying
to
him. I am sure I am going to get some "smart" reply from him after I
post
this BUT I will resist in getting dragged into a waste of time
discussion
because I am extremely busy writting code with one of the best web
frameworks out there and I have worked with JSP, Servlet, JSF, Struts,
Webworks, Spring WebFlow, Tapestry 3, Tapestry 4 .......... (I am
considering T5 to be a new framework which is why I no longer worry
about
backwards compatibility)
Please don't get me wrong. I don't mean to patronise the people that
reply
to him. In fact few of you guys that replied to his discussions
already
helped me out through this forum by replying to my posts and I am very
thankful of this BUT please.... let's keep this forum clean from
destructions and clean from emotional counter productive arguments and
let's
stop providing free entertainment.
Cheers,
Petros
Martin Kersten-2 wrote:
Rob your English is by no question admirable but you drove quite
to far. I like all those Tapestry folks - special thanks to the core
team and Howard from me. Thanks to their affords Web-Development
Is fun again.
So please stop insulting them.
Rob Smeets wrote:
Like those reading now, I'm smelling something fishy here.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Getting-Answers-on-the-User-List-tp16595432p16737253.html
Sent from the Tapestry - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
http://thegodcode.net
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
