Hi Mark,
I've updated the "anonymous" contributors, and currently there are around
20 contributors in early 2012, and 90 for now (compared to 10/~60
separately before). Would those data be more reasonable?
Best,
Shuyang
Shuyang Wu <shuya...@apache.org> 于2021年5月11日周二 下午11:37写道：
> Hi Christopher,
>
> Thanks for the idea! The mailing list is also a significant part of our
> community and I think we also need graphs about that. Since Kibble is
> somewhat not so handy for me right now, I'll try to fetch pony mail API and
> create graphs about it later.
>
> Best, Shuyang
>
> Wo Soyoung <wosoyo...@gmail.com> 于2021年5月11日周二 下午11:31写道：
>
>> Hi Mark,
>>
>> For the svn->git conversion problem, a good method I found is that use
>> Github API to filter out the "anonymous contributors" who are commit
>> authors but the commit email is not bound to a certain GitHub account. Do
>> you mind to tell if these data are helpful to the problem, then I could add
>> them to the graph data.
>>
>> And here is the list I get:
>> 0 {billbar...@apache.org 4/10/2006 1:36:19 0 UTC}
>> 1 {p...@apache.org 4/26/2006 6:10:53 0 UTC}
>> 2 {funk...@apache.org 6/20/2006 11:12:30 0 UTC}
>> 3 {jh...@apache.org 8/6/2006 23:35:29 0 UTC}
>> 4 {fcarr...@apache.org 3/25/2007 1:08:07 0 UTC}
>> 5 {rj...@apache.org 5/20/2007 17:12:08 0 UTC}
>> 6 {kkoli...@apache.org 5/21/2009 2:07:25 0 UTC}
>> 7 {idar...@apache.org 9/12/2009 16:58:08 0 UTC}
>> 8 {kfuj...@apache.org 3/31/2010 6:08:32 0 UTC}
>> 9 {kfuj...@apache.org 3/31/2010 6:08:32 0 UTC}
>> 10 {kfuj...@apache.org 3/31/2010 6:08:32 0 UTC}
>> 11 {t...@apache.org 9/23/2010 10:14:54 0 UTC}
>> 12 {schu...@apache.org 12/3/2010 16:07:50 0 UTC}
>> 13 {jboy...@apache.org 7/13/2013 22:07:49 0 UTC}
>> 14 {kpreis...@apache.org 9/25/2013 14:15:05 0 UTC}
>> 15 {r...@apache.org 4/11/2014 22:42:43 0 UTC}
>> 16 {ma...@apache.org 4/12/2014 20:07:54 0 UTC}
>> 17 {kkoli...@apache.org 4/12/2014 20:45:42 0 UTC}
>> 18 {schu...@apache.org 4/15/2014 1:08:22 0 UTC}
>> 19 {fschumacher@unknown 9/21/2014 12:55:15 0 UTC}
>> 20 {remm@unknown 12/1/2014 19:29:48 0 UTC}
>> 21 {markt@unknown 4/2/2015 16:59:22 0 UTC}
>> 22 {asf-sync-process@unknown 10/15/2015 9:26:08 0 UTC}
>> 23 {ogn...@apache.org 1/6/2016 8:32:30 0 UTC}
>> 24 {hux...@apache.org 10/8/2016 8:00:23 0 UTC}
>> 25 {kfujino@unknown 1/17/2017 8:35:29 0 UTC}
>> 26 {isapir@unknown 6/8/2018 20:33:09 0 UTC}
>> 27 {kkolinko@unknown 2/11/2019 10:55:26 0 UTC}
>> 28 {remm@omni 2/28/2019 17:30:21 0 UTC}
>> 29 {g...@win-10-x64-dev.homeinbox.net 12/7/2019 13:27:54 0 UTC}
>> 30 {kyle.stiem...@contrastsecurity.com 9/10/2020 20:47:21 0 UTC}
>>
>> Best,
>> Shuyang
>>
>> Mark Thomas <ma...@apache.org> 于2021年5月10日周一 下午4:57写道：
>>
>>> On 10/05/2021 21:47, Christopher Schultz wrote:
>>> > Shuyang,
>>> >
>>> > On 5/10/21 13:21, Shuyang Wu wrote:
>>> >> Thanks for the information! I'll try to see if we could make some
>>> >> improvements on the compatibility with svn
>>> >
>>> > I understand you are more focused on commits than anything else, here,
>>> > but the community is really more defined by the mailing list(s) than
>>> the
>>> > commit history.
>>> >
>>> > Sure, commits are *one* metric, but that's only ... commits.
>>> >
>>> > I would be more interested in seeing a graph of number of mailing list
>>> > messages relative to the number of unique senders on a monthly basis.
>>> I
>>> > think *that* would be a better community metric than number-of-commits
>>> > or number-of-unique-committers.
>>>
>>> https://kibble.apache.org/
>>>
>>> Mark
>>> >
>>>
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
>>>
>>>
