Hi Mark, I've updated the "anonymous" contributors, and currently there are around 20 contributors in early 2012, and 90 for now (compared to 10/~60 separately before). Would those data be more reasonable?
Best, Shuyang Shuyang Wu <[email protected]> 于2021年5月11日周二 下午11:37写道： > Hi Christopher, > > Thanks for the idea! The mailing list is also a significant part of our > community and I think we also need graphs about that. Since Kibble is > somewhat not so handy for me right now, I'll try to fetch pony mail API and > create graphs about it later. > > Best, Shuyang > > Wo Soyoung <[email protected]> 于2021年5月11日周二 下午11:31写道： > >> Hi Mark, >> >> For the svn->git conversion problem, a good method I found is that use >> Github API to filter out the "anonymous contributors" who are commit >> authors but the commit email is not bound to a certain GitHub account. Do >> you mind to tell if these data are helpful to the problem, then I could add >> them to the graph data. >> >> And here is the list I get: >> 0 {[email protected] 4/10/2006 1:36:19 0 UTC} >> 1 {[email protected] 4/26/2006 6:10:53 0 UTC} >> 2 {[email protected] 6/20/2006 11:12:30 0 UTC} >> 3 {[email protected] 8/6/2006 23:35:29 0 UTC} >> 4 {[email protected] 3/25/2007 1:08:07 0 UTC} >> 5 {[email protected] 5/20/2007 17:12:08 0 UTC} >> 6 {[email protected] 5/21/2009 2:07:25 0 UTC} >> 7 {[email protected] 9/12/2009 16:58:08 0 UTC} >> 8 {[email protected] 3/31/2010 6:08:32 0 UTC} >> 9 {[email protected] 3/31/2010 6:08:32 0 UTC} >> 10 {[email protected] 3/31/2010 6:08:32 0 UTC} >> 11 {[email protected] 9/23/2010 10:14:54 0 UTC} >> 12 {[email protected] 12/3/2010 16:07:50 0 UTC} >> 13 {[email protected] 7/13/2013 22:07:49 0 UTC} >> 14 {[email protected] 9/25/2013 14:15:05 0 UTC} >> 15 {[email protected] 4/11/2014 22:42:43 0 UTC} >> 16 {[email protected] 4/12/2014 20:07:54 0 UTC} >> 17 {[email protected] 4/12/2014 20:45:42 0 UTC} >> 18 {[email protected] 4/15/2014 1:08:22 0 UTC} >> 19 {fschumacher@unknown 9/21/2014 12:55:15 0 UTC} >> 20 {remm@unknown 12/1/2014 19:29:48 0 UTC} >> 21 {markt@unknown 4/2/2015 16:59:22 0 UTC} >> 22 {asf-sync-process@unknown 10/15/2015 9:26:08 0 UTC} >> 23 {[email protected] 1/6/2016 8:32:30 0 UTC} >> 24 {[email protected] 10/8/2016 8:00:23 0 UTC} >> 25 {kfujino@unknown 1/17/2017 8:35:29 0 UTC} >> 26 {isapir@unknown 6/8/2018 20:33:09 0 UTC} >> 27 {kkolinko@unknown 2/11/2019 10:55:26 0 UTC} >> 28 {remm@omni 2/28/2019 17:30:21 0 UTC} >> 29 {[email protected] 12/7/2019 13:27:54 0 UTC} >> 30 {[email protected] 9/10/2020 20:47:21 0 UTC} >> >> Best, >> Shuyang >> >> Mark Thomas <[email protected]> 于2021年5月10日周一 下午4:57写道： >> >>> On 10/05/2021 21:47, Christopher Schultz wrote: >>> > Shuyang, >>> > >>> > On 5/10/21 13:21, Shuyang Wu wrote: >>> >> Thanks for the information! I'll try to see if we could make some >>> >> improvements on the compatibility with svn >>> > >>> > I understand you are more focused on commits than anything else, here, >>> > but the community is really more defined by the mailing list(s) than >>> the >>> > commit history. >>> > >>> > Sure, commits are *one* metric, but that's only ... commits. >>> > >>> > I would be more interested in seeing a graph of number of mailing list >>> > messages relative to the number of unique senders on a monthly basis. >>> I >>> > think *that* would be a better community metric than number-of-commits >>> > or number-of-unique-committers. >>> >>> https://kibble.apache.org/ >>> >>> Mark >>> > >>> >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >>> >>>
