then you are violating the contract of wicket:message. if we do this then there is little point to allowing body inside wicket:message
-igor On 11/3/07, Eelco Hillenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Mmmm. I must say I agree with this. I'd actually prefer it to throw an > > exception. ;-) > > I'm surprised we don't do this already! > > I would have expected that if > IResourceSettings#getThrowExceptionOnMissingResource returns true, an > exception would be thrown here as well. I think we should fix it. > > > Maybe we should add this as a feature? > > getMarkupSettings().setThrowExceptionOnEmptyMessageTagKeyMissing(true) > > or something equally descriptive. ;-) > > If we have the exception that outputs the missing key, that should be > enough imho. I'm not against adding this, but I don't we we need it > once we implement throwing that exception. > > Eelco > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
