On 11/3/07, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > then you are violating the contract of wicket:message. if we do this > then there is little point to allowing body inside wicket:message
Erm, where is that contract defined? The body is for previewing. I don't think I ever thought about this as a default, nor do I think we should, since that is inconsistent with what we do elsewhere. Eelco --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
