Could'nt one petition a JSR for wicket? :)

-regards Nino

2009/12/22 Chris Colman <chr...@stepaheadsoftware.com>:
>> > > I know JSF is standard; what is your idea about current JSF
> status?
>> >
>> > Just forget about it ... ;)
>
> Agreed!
>
>> JSF is way too complex for doing simple things. They -again- forgot
> the
>> KISS principle (Keep it Simple & Straightforward/Stupid).
>>
>> Wicket (but also Tapestry) is in my opinion a giant leap forward. I
>> wondaer when the JSF spec will start look like this way of working...
>
> Probably never because often what starts out as an unjustifiable and
> unattractive design that is adopted by people simply because it doesn't
> stray too far from the legacy "framework" (JSP) soon becomes "justified"
> on the basis of some irrational, semi religious beliefs. Once it reaches
> that point there is no turning back because to change would be to admit
> they weren't perfect at some point in the past.
>
> The good thing is that rational people are free to choose the best
> solution regardless of what 'the standard' might be.
>
> It's a good thing that many programmers are usually freedom fighting
> mavericks or we'd all be writing desktop apps in Visual Basic (not that
> I ever used VB - I was more a C/C++ kind of guy =] )
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org

Reply via email to