I agree with you. I think becoming a JSR also adds lots of friction to development.
2009/12/22 nino martinez wael <nino.martinez.w...@gmail.com> > Could'nt one petition a JSR for wicket? :) > > -regards Nino > > 2009/12/22 Chris Colman <chr...@stepaheadsoftware.com>: > >> > > I know JSF is standard; what is your idea about current JSF > > status? > >> > > >> > Just forget about it ... ;) > > > > Agreed! > > > >> JSF is way too complex for doing simple things. They -again- forgot > > the > >> KISS principle (Keep it Simple & Straightforward/Stupid). > >> > >> Wicket (but also Tapestry) is in my opinion a giant leap forward. I > >> wondaer when the JSF spec will start look like this way of working... > > > > Probably never because often what starts out as an unjustifiable and > > unattractive design that is adopted by people simply because it doesn't > > stray too far from the legacy "framework" (JSP) soon becomes "justified" > > on the basis of some irrational, semi religious beliefs. Once it reaches > > that point there is no turning back because to change would be to admit > > they weren't perfect at some point in the past. > > > > The good thing is that rational people are free to choose the best > > solution regardless of what 'the standard' might be. > > > > It's a good thing that many programmers are usually freedom fighting > > mavericks or we'd all be writing desktop apps in Visual Basic (not that > > I ever used VB - I was more a C/C++ kind of guy =] ) > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org > > -- Altuğ.
