valhalla-dev  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8387540: [lworld] ForceEarlyReturnVoid should fail with OPAQUE_FRAME if target thread's top frame is value class constructor Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8387540: [lworld] ForceEarlyReturnVoid should fail with OPAQUE_FRAME if target thread's top frame is value class constructor Alan Bateman
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8387540: [lworld] ForceEarlyReturnVoid should fail with OPAQUE_FRAME if target thread's top frame is value class constructor Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8387540: [lworld] ForceEarlyReturnVoid should fail with OPAQUE_FRAME if target thread's top frame is value class constructor [v2] Alan Bateman
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8387540: [lworld] ForceEarlyReturnVoid should fail with OPAQUE_FRAME if target thread's top frame is value class constructor Alan Bateman
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8387540: [lworld] ForceEarlyReturnVoid should fail with OPAQUE_FRAME if target thread's top frame is value class constructor Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8387540: [lworld] ForceEarlyReturnVoid should fail with OPAQUE_FRAME if target thread's top frame is value class constructor David Holmes
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8387540: [lworld] ForceEarlyReturnVoid should fail with OPAQUE_FRAME if target thread's top frame is value class constructor Alan Bateman
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8387540: [lworld] ForceEarlyReturnVoid should fail with OPAQUE_FRAME if target thread's top frame is value class constructor [v2] Alan Bateman
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8387540: [lworld] ForceEarlyReturnVoid should fail with OPAQUE_FRAME if target thread's top frame is value class constructor [v3] Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8387540: [lworld] ForceEarlyReturnVoid should fail with OPAQUE_FRAME if target thread's top frame is value class constructor [v3] David Holmes
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8387540: [lworld] ForceEarlyReturnVoid should fail with OPAQUE_FRAME if target thread's top frame is value class constructor [v3] David Holmes
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8387540: [lworld] ForceEarlyReturnVoid should fail with OPAQUE_FRAME if target thread's top frame is value class constructor [v3] Alan Bateman
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8387540: [lworld] ForceEarlyReturnVoid should fail with OPAQUE_FRAME if target thread's top frame is value class constructor [v3] David Holmes
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8387540: [lworld] ForceEarlyReturnVoid should fail with OPAQUE_FRAME if target thread's top frame is value class constructor [v2] Alan Bateman
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8387540: [lworld] ForceEarlyReturnVoid should fail with OPAQUE_FRAME if target thread's top frame is value class constructor [v2] Chris Plummer
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8387540: [lworld] ForceEarlyReturnVoid should fail with OPAQUE_FRAME if target thread's top frame is value class constructor [v2] Alan Bateman
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8387540: [lworld] ForceEarlyReturnVoid should fail with OPAQUE_FRAME if target thread's top frame is value class constructor [v2] Chris Plummer
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8387540: [lworld] ForceEarlyReturnVoid should fail with OPAQUE_FRAME if target thread's top frame is value class constructor [v2] Alan Bateman
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8387540: [lworld] ForceEarlyReturnVoid should fail with OPAQUE_FRAME if target thread's top frame is value class constructor [v3] Alan Bateman
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8387540: [lworld] ForceEarlyReturnVoid should fail with OPAQUE_FRAME if target thread's top frame is value class constructor [v3] Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8387540: [lworld] ForceEarlyReturnVoid should fail with OPAQUE_FRAME if target thread's top frame is value class constructor [v3] Alan Bateman
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8387540: [lworld] ForceEarlyReturnVoid should fail with OPAQUE_FRAME if target thread's top frame is value class constructor [v3] duke
  • [lworld] Integrated: 8387540: [lworld] ForceEarlyReturnVoid should fail with OPAQUE_FRAME if target thread's top frame is value class constructor Alan Bateman
• [lworld] RFR: 8385112: [lworld] 8369044 fix missing for arm and ppc Daisuke Yamazaki
  • [lworld] Withdrawn: 8385112: 8369044 fix missing for arm and ppc Daisuke Yamazaki
• [lworld] RFR: 8387495: [lworld] Typo in javadoc of jdk/internal/util/ReferencedKeyMap.java Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8387495: [lworld] Typo in javadoc of jdk/internal/util/ReferencedKeyMap.java Alan Bateman
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8387495: [lworld] Typo in javadoc of jdk/internal/util/ReferencedKeyMap.java Chen Liang
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8387495: [lworld] Typo in javadoc of jdk/internal/util/ReferencedKeyMap.java Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8387495: [lworld] Typo in javadoc of jdk/internal/util/ReferencedKeyMap.java duke
  • [lworld] Integrated: 8387495: [lworld] Typo in javadoc of jdk/internal/util/ReferencedKeyMap.java Jaikiran Pai
• [lworld] RFR: 8387488: [lworld] C2: acmp expansion fails with assert(replace != nullptr) failed: must succeed Tobias Hartmann
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8387488: [lworld] C2: acmp expansion fails with assert(replace != nullptr) failed: must succeed Tobias Hartmann
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8387488: [lworld] C2: acmp expansion fails with assert(replace != nullptr) failed: must succeed Quan Anh Mai
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8387488: [lworld] C2: acmp expansion fails with assert(replace != nullptr) failed: must succeed [v2] Quan Anh Mai
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8387488: [lworld] C2: acmp expansion fails with assert(replace != nullptr) failed: must succeed [v3] Tobias Hartmann
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8387488: [lworld] C2: acmp expansion fails with assert(replace != nullptr) failed: must succeed Marc Chevalier
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8387488: [lworld] C2: acmp expansion fails with assert(replace != nullptr) failed: must succeed Tobias Hartmann
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8387488: [lworld] C2: acmp expansion fails with assert(replace != nullptr) failed: must succeed [v2] Tobias Hartmann
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8387488: [lworld] C2: acmp expansion fails with assert(replace != nullptr) failed: must succeed [v3] Tobias Hartmann
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8387488: [lworld] C2: acmp expansion fails with assert(replace != nullptr) failed: must succeed [v3] Quan Anh Mai
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8387488: [lworld] C2: acmp expansion fails with assert(replace != nullptr) failed: must succeed [v3] Tobias Hartmann
  • [lworld] Integrated: 8387488: [lworld] C2: acmp expansion fails with assert(replace != nullptr) failed: must succeed Tobias Hartmann
• [lworld] RFR: 8386676: [lworld] Infinite loop when pushing inline types down though phis during IGVN Roland Westrelin
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8386676: [lworld] Infinite loop when pushing inline types down though phis during IGVN Tobias Hartmann
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8386676: [lworld] Infinite loop when pushing inline types down though phis during IGVN [v2] Roland Westrelin
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8386676: [lworld] Infinite loop when pushing inline types down though phis during IGVN [v2] Tobias Hartmann
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8386676: [lworld] Infinite loop when pushing inline types down though phis during IGVN [v2] Roland Westrelin
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8386676: [lworld] Infinite loop when pushing inline types down though phis during IGVN [v2] Tobias Hartmann
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8386676: [lworld] Infinite loop when pushing inline types down though phis during IGVN [v2] Roland Westrelin
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8386676: [lworld] Infinite loop when pushing inline types down though phis during IGVN Roland Westrelin
  • [lworld] Integrated: 8386676: [lworld] Infinite loop when pushing inline types down though phis during IGVN Roland Westrelin
• [lworld] RFR: 8387484: [lworld] javac should warn on use of value classes Jan Lahoda
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8387484: [lworld] javac should warn on use of value classes Maurizio Cimadamore
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8387484: [lworld] javac should warn on use of value classes Chen Liang
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8387484: [lworld] javac should warn on use of value classes [v2] Jan Lahoda
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8387484: [lworld] javac should warn on use of value classes Vicente Romero
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8387484: [lworld] javac should warn on use of value classes [v2] Jan Lahoda
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8387484: [lworld] javac should warn on use of value classes [v2] Chen Liang
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8387484: [lworld] javac should warn on use of value classes [v2] duke
  • [lworld] Integrated: 8387484: [lworld] javac should warn on use of value classes Jan Lahoda
• [lworld] RFR: 8387464: [lworld] Increase memlimit and unproblemlist TestValueConstruction.java Manuel Hässig
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8387464: [lworld] Increase memlimit and unproblemlist TestValueConstruction.java Tobias Hartmann
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8387464: [lworld] Increase memlimit and unproblemlist TestValueConstruction.java [v2] Manuel Hässig
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8387464: [lworld] Increase memlimit and unproblemlist TestValueConstruction.java [v2] Tobias Hartmann
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8387464: [lworld] Increase memlimit and unproblemlist TestValueConstruction.java [v2] Manuel Hässig
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8387464: [lworld] Increase memlimit and unproblemlist TestValueConstruction.java [v2] duke
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8387464: [lworld] Increase memlimit and unproblemlist TestValueConstruction.java Manuel Hässig
  • [lworld] Integrated: 8387464: [lworld] Increase memlimit and unproblemlist TestValueConstruction.java Manuel Hässig
• [lworld] RFR: 8386160: [lworld] Post jdk-27+25 compiler/valhalla/inlinetypes/TestIntrinsics.java#id4 assertion Quan Anh Mai
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8386160: [lworld] Post jdk-27+25 compiler/valhalla/inlinetypes/TestIntrinsics.java#id4 assertion Tobias Hartmann
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8386160: [lworld] Post jdk-27+25 compiler/valhalla/inlinetypes/TestIntrinsics.java#id4 assertion Quan Anh Mai
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8386160: [lworld] Post jdk-27+25 compiler/valhalla/inlinetypes/TestIntrinsics.java#id4 assertion Tobias Hartmann
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8386160: [lworld] Post jdk-27+25 compiler/valhalla/inlinetypes/TestIntrinsics.java#id4 assertion [v2] Quan Anh Mai
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8386160: [lworld] Post jdk-27+25 compiler/valhalla/inlinetypes/TestIntrinsics.java#id4 assertion [v2] Quan Anh Mai
  • [lworld] Integrated: 8386160: [lworld] Post jdk-27+25 compiler/valhalla/inlinetypes/TestIntrinsics.java#id4 assertion Quan Anh Mai
• [lworld] Integrated: 8387460: [lworld] ProblemList vmTestbase/nsk/jdi/Accessible/modifiers/modifiers001/TestDescription.java with enable-preview Daniel D . Daugherty
  • Re: [lworld] Integrated: 8387460: [lworld] ProblemList vmTestbase/nsk/jdi/Accessible/modifiers/modifiers001/TestDescription.java with enable-preview David Holmes
  • Re: [lworld] Integrated: 8387460: [lworld] ProblemList vmTestbase/nsk/jdi/Accessible/modifiers/modifiers001/TestDescription.java with enable-preview Daniel D . Daugherty
  • [lworld] Integrated: 8387460: [lworld] ProblemList vmTestbase/nsk/jdi/Accessible/modifiers/modifiers001/TestDescription.java with enable-preview Daniel D . Daugherty
• [lworld] RFR: 8387454: [lworld] Update Strict fields JEP number Chen Liang
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8387454: [lworld] Update Strict fields JEP number David Holmes
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8387454: [lworld] Update Strict fields JEP number Chen Liang
  • [lworld] Integrated: 8387454: [lworld] Update Strict fields JEP number Chen Liang
• New candidate JEP: 539: Strict Field Initialization in the JVM (Preview) Mark Reinhold
• [lworld] RFR: 8387417: [lworld] API doc improvements for java.lang.Object Alan Bateman
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8387417: [lworld] API doc improvements for java.lang.Object Chen Liang
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8387417: [lworld] API doc improvements for java.lang.Object Alan Bateman
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8387417: [lworld] API doc improvements for java.lang.Object Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8387417: [lworld] API doc improvements for java.lang.Object Alan Bateman
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8387417: [lworld] API doc improvements for java.lang.Object Chen Liang
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8387417: [lworld] API doc improvements for java.lang.Object [v2] Alan Bateman
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8387417: [lworld] API doc improvements for java.lang.Object Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8387417: [lworld] API doc improvements for java.lang.Object [v2] Alan Bateman
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8387417: [lworld] API doc improvements for java.lang.Object [v2] Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8387417: [lworld] API doc improvements for java.lang.Object [v2] Alan Bateman
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8387417: [lworld] API doc improvements for java.lang.Object [v2] Chen Liang
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8387417: [lworld] API doc improvements for java.lang.Object [v2] duke
  • [lworld] Integrated: 8387417: [lworld] API doc improvements for java.lang.Object Alan Bateman
• [lworld] RFR: 8387428: [lworld] ProblemList tests affected by JDK-8349772 Daniel D . Daugherty
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8387428: [lworld] ProblemList tests affected by JDK-8349772 Frederic Parain
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8387428: [lworld] ProblemList tests affected by JDK-8349772 Daniel D . Daugherty
  • [lworld] Integrated: 8387428: [lworld] ProblemList tests affected by JDK-8349772 Daniel D . Daugherty
• [lworld] RFR: 8386067: [lworld] C2 asserts with "Missed Ideal optimization opportunity in PhaseIterGVN for CmpL" Tobias Hartmann
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8386067: [lworld] C2 asserts with "Missed Ideal optimization opportunity in PhaseIterGVN for CmpL" Tobias Hartmann
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8386067: [lworld] C2 asserts with "Missed Ideal optimization opportunity in PhaseIterGVN for CmpL" Tobias Hartmann
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8386067: [lworld] C2 asserts with "Missed Ideal optimization opportunity in PhaseIterGVN for CmpL" [v2] Tobias Hartmann
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8386067: [lworld] C2 asserts with "Missed Ideal optimization opportunity in PhaseIterGVN for CmpL" [v2] Christian Hagedorn
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8386067: [lworld] C2 asserts with "Missed Ideal optimization opportunity in PhaseIterGVN for CmpL" [v2] Tobias Hartmann
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8386067: [lworld] C2 asserts with "Missed Ideal optimization opportunity in PhaseIterGVN for CmpL" [v2] Tobias Hartmann
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8386067: [lworld] C2 asserts with "Missed Ideal optimization opportunity in PhaseIterGVN for CmpL" Tobias Hartmann
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8386067: [lworld] C2 asserts with "Missed Ideal optimization opportunity in PhaseIterGVN for CmpL" [v3] Tobias Hartmann
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8386067: [lworld] C2 asserts with "Missed Ideal optimization opportunity in PhaseIterGVN for CmpL" [v3] Christian Hagedorn
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8386067: [lworld] C2 asserts with "Missed Ideal optimization opportunity in PhaseIterGVN for CmpL" [v3] Tobias Hartmann
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8386067: [lworld] C2 asserts with "Missed Ideal optimization opportunity in PhaseIterGVN for CmpL" [v4] Tobias Hartmann
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8386067: [lworld] C2 asserts with "Missed Ideal optimization opportunity in PhaseIterGVN for CmpL" [v4] Christian Hagedorn
  • [lworld] Integrated: 8386067: [lworld] C2 asserts with "Missed Ideal optimization opportunity in PhaseIterGVN for CmpL" Tobias Hartmann
• [lworld] RFR: 8387389: [lworld] Cherry-pick JDK-8386844 Tobias Hartmann
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8387389: [lworld] Cherry-pick JDK-8386844 Marc Chevalier
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8387389: [lworld] Cherry-pick JDK-8386844 Tobias Hartmann
  • [lworld] Integrated: 8387389: [lworld] Cherry-pick JDK-8386844 Tobias Hartmann
• [lworld] RFR: 8386858: [lworld] omit load_prototype_header when UseObjectMonitorTable is used Daisuke Yamazaki
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8386858: [lworld] omit load_prototype_header when UseObjectMonitorTable is used Coleen Phillimore
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8386858: [lworld] omit load_prototype_header when UseObjectMonitorTable is used Daisuke Yamazaki
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8386858: [lworld] omit load_prototype_header when UseObjectMonitorTable is used duke
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8386858: [lworld] omit load_prototype_header when UseObjectMonitorTable is used David Holmes
  • [lworld] Integrated: 8386858: [lworld] omit load_prototype_header when UseObjectMonitorTable is used Daisuke Yamazaki
• [lworld] RFR: 8387374: [lworld] Address test issues in test/jdk/java/io/Serializable/valueObjects/ValueSerializationTest.java Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8387374: [lworld] Address test issues in test/jdk/java/io/Serializable/valueObjects/ValueSerializationTest.java [v2] Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8387374: [lworld] Address test issues in test/jdk/java/io/Serializable/valueObjects/ValueSerializationTest.java [v3] Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8387374: [lworld] Address test issues in test/jdk/java/io/Serializable/valueObjects/ValueSerializationTest.java [v3] Viktor Klang
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8387374: [lworld] Address test issues in test/jdk/java/io/Serializable/valueObjects/ValueSerializationTest.java [v3] Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8387374: [lworld] Address test issues in test/jdk/java/io/Serializable/valueObjects/ValueSerializationTest.java [v3] Viktor Klang
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8387374: [lworld] Address test issues in test/jdk/java/io/Serializable/valueObjects/ValueSerializationTest.java [v3] Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8387374: [lworld] Address test issues in test/jdk/java/io/Serializable/valueObjects/ValueSerializationTest.java [v3] Viktor Klang
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8387374: [lworld] Address test issues in test/jdk/java/io/Serializable/valueObjects/ValueSerializationTest.java [v4] Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8387374: [lworld] Address test issues in test/jdk/java/io/Serializable/valueObjects/ValueSerializationTest.java [v5] Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8387374: [lworld] Address test issues in test/jdk/java/io/Serializable/valueObjects/ValueSerializationTest.java [v5] Chen Liang
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8387374: [lworld] Address test issues in test/jdk/java/io/Serializable/valueObjects/ValueSerializationTest.java [v5] Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8387374: [lworld] Address test issues in test/jdk/java/io/Serializable/valueObjects/ValueSerializationTest.java [v5] Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8387374: [lworld] Address test issues in test/jdk/java/io/Serializable/valueObjects/ValueSerializationTest.java [v6] Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8387374: [lworld] Address test issues in test/jdk/java/io/Serializable/valueObjects/ValueSerializationTest.java [v6] Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8387374: [lworld] Address test issues in test/jdk/java/io/Serializable/valueObjects/ValueSerializationTest.java [v6] Chen Liang
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8387374: [lworld] Address test issues in test/jdk/java/io/Serializable/valueObjects/ValueSerializationTest.java [v7] Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8387374: [lworld] Address test issues in test/jdk/java/io/Serializable/valueObjects/ValueSerializationTest.java [v7] Chen Liang
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8387374: [lworld] Address test issues in test/jdk/java/io/Serializable/valueObjects/ValueSerializationTest.java [v7] Chen Liang
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8387374: [lworld] Address test issues in test/jdk/java/io/Serializable/valueObjects/ValueSerializationTest.java [v7] Viktor Klang
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8387374: [lworld] Address test issues in test/jdk/java/io/Serializable/valueObjects/ValueSerializationTest.java [v7] Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8387374: [lworld] Address test issues in test/jdk/java/io/Serializable/valueObjects/ValueSerializationTest.java [v7] Viktor Klang
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8387374: [lworld] Address test issues in test/jdk/java/io/Serializable/valueObjects/ValueSerializationTest.java [v8] Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8387374: [lworld] Address test issues in test/jdk/java/io/Serializable/valueObjects/ValueSerializationTest.java [v8] Viktor Klang
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8387374: [lworld] Address test issues in test/jdk/java/io/Serializable/valueObjects/ValueSerializationTest.java [v8] Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8387374: [lworld] Address test issues in test/jdk/java/io/Serializable/valueObjects/ValueSerializationTest.java [v8] duke
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8387374: [lworld] Address test issues in test/jdk/java/io/Serializable/valueObjects/ValueSerializationTest.java [v8] Chen Liang
  • [lworld] Integrated: 8387374: [lworld] Address test issues in test/jdk/java/io/Serializable/valueObjects/ValueSerializationTest.java Jaikiran Pai
• [lworld] Integrated: 8387001: [lworld] compiler/eliminateAutobox/TestSafepointDebugInfo.java asserts with preview since merge jdk-28+3 Tobias Hartmann
  • Re: [lworld] Integrated: 8387001: [lworld] compiler/eliminateAutobox/TestSafepointDebugInfo.java asserts with preview since merge jdk-28+3 Marc Chevalier
  • [lworld] Integrated: 8387001: [lworld] compiler/eliminateAutobox/TestSafepointDebugInfo.java asserts with preview since merge jdk-28+3 Tobias Hartmann
  • Re: [lworld] Integrated: 8387001: [lworld] compiler/eliminateAutobox/TestSafepointDebugInfo.java asserts with preview since merge jdk-28+3 Tobias Hartmann
• [lworld] RFR: 8386719: [lworld] Remaining ValueClass argument verification issues Frederic Parain
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8386719: [lworld] Remaining ValueClass argument verification issues Coleen Phillimore
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8386719: [lworld] Remaining ValueClass argument verification issues Frederic Parain
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8386719: [lworld] Remaining ValueClass argument verification issues [v2] Coleen Phillimore
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8386719: [lworld] Remaining ValueClass argument verification issues [v2] Frederic Parain
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8386719: [lworld] Remaining ValueClass argument verification issues [v2] Coleen Phillimore
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8386719: [lworld] Remaining ValueClass argument verification issues [v2] Frederic Parain
  • [lworld] Integrated: 8386719: [lworld] Remaining ValueClass argument verification issues Frederic Parain
• [lworld] RFR: 8381693: [lworld] IR Framework tests should run in jtreg driver mode Tobias Hartmann
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8381693: [lworld] IR Framework tests should run in jtreg driver mode [v2] Tobias Hartmann
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8381693: [lworld] IR Framework tests should run in jtreg driver mode [v2] Christian Hagedorn
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8381693: [lworld] IR Framework tests should run in jtreg driver mode [v2] Tobias Hartmann
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8381693: [lworld] IR Framework tests should run in jtreg driver mode [v3] Tobias Hartmann
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8381693: [lworld] IR Framework tests should run in jtreg driver mode [v4] Tobias Hartmann
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8381693: [lworld] IR Framework tests should run in jtreg driver mode [v4] Christian Hagedorn
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8381693: [lworld] IR Framework tests should run in jtreg driver mode [v5] Tobias Hartmann
  • [lworld] Integrated: 8381693: [lworld] IR Framework tests should run in jtreg driver mode Tobias Hartmann
• [lworld] RFR: 8387274: [lworld] Various clean-ups from review comments Christian Hagedorn
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8387274: [lworld] Various clean-ups from review comments Christian Hagedorn
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8387274: [lworld] Various clean-ups from review comments Tobias Hartmann
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8387274: [lworld] Various clean-ups from review comments [v2] Christian Hagedorn
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8387274: [lworld] Various clean-ups from review comments Martin Doerr
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8387274: [lworld] Various clean-ups from review comments Christian Hagedorn
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8387274: [lworld] Various clean-ups from review comments Martin Doerr
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8387274: [lworld] Various clean-ups from review comments [v2] Christian Hagedorn
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8387274: [lworld] Various clean-ups from review comments [v2] Christian Hagedorn
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8387274: [lworld] Various clean-ups from review comments [v2] Martin Doerr
  • [lworld] Integrated: 8387274: [lworld] Various clean-ups from review comments Christian Hagedorn
• [lworld] RFR: 8387304: [lworld] Review the specs of reflective preview APIs Chen Liang
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8387304: [lworld] Review the specs of reflective preview APIs ExE Boss
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8387304: [lworld] Review the specs of reflective preview APIs Chen Liang
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8387304: [lworld] Review the specs of reflective preview APIs Chen Liang
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8387304: [lworld] Review the specs of reflective preview APIs [v2] Chen Liang
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8387304: [lworld] Review the specs of reflective preview APIs [v2] Alan Bateman
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8387304: [lworld] Review the specs of reflective preview APIs [v2] ExE Boss
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8387304: [lworld] Review the specs of reflective preview APIs [v2] Chen Liang
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8387304: [lworld] Review the specs of reflective preview APIs [v2] Chen Liang
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8387304: [lworld] Review the specs of reflective preview APIs [v2] Chen Liang
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8387304: [lworld] Review the specs of reflective preview APIs [v2] Chen Liang
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8387304: [lworld] Review the specs of reflective preview APIs [v3] Chen Liang

• Earlier messages
• Later messages