But the only reason why this matter is so significant is, of course,
  because if one believes there's always (or generally) a need for a
  proper though bass line then it reinforces the requirement for bourdons
  but if, as I believe, much of this music is really melody punctuated
  and supported by harmony as chords then the need for bourdons is
  clearly much less. I also think the use of a skeletal bass line even
  supports this ie they are using the odd (often tonic) bass as short
  harmonic reminder - if you see what I mean. In short, not so very
  different from your 'English' guittar....

Yes - it is a circular argument based on different people's perceptions of the music and whether they think a continuous bass line is really necessary. People who are used to always having a bass line may find it difficult to come to terms with the idea that music works well without one.

Monica

  --- On Tue, 8/2/11, Stuart Walsh <s.wa...@ntlworld.com> wrote:

    From: Stuart Walsh <s.wa...@ntlworld.com>
    Subject: [VIHUELA] Re: The stringing of the baroque guitar - again
    To: "Martyn Hodgson" <hodgsonmar...@yahoo.co.uk>
    Cc: "Vihuelalist" <vihuela@cs.dartmouth.edu>, "Monica Hall"
    <mjlh...@tiscali.co.uk>
    Date: Tuesday, 8 February, 2011, 11:26

  On 08/02/2011 10:53, Martyn Hodgson wrote:
  >     Hello Stuart,
  >
  >     Didn't you read me email quite through? - I specifically wrote
  about
  >     Granata's Op 5!  You'll see I take it as a good example of not
  >     overbothering about a proper through bass line and thus an
  example of
  >     melodic writing interspersed with chords rather than an example
  of two
  >     part writing and this obliging us to provide a through bass on
  the
  >     guitar.
  >
  >     And yes, the 'viola' is what many Italian sources of this period
  call a
  >     bass violin (ie not a violoncello). Only later did it come to
  refer
  >     exclusively to the tenor of the violin family.
  >
  >     rgds
  >
  >     M
  Martyn
  I did read your email! I was just (politely, of course) disagreeing
  with
  your idea that:
  You'll see I take it as a good example of not overbothering about a
  proper through bass line and thus an example of
  melodic writing interspersed with chords rather than an example of
  two-part writing...
  I suppose the line between "melodic writing interspersed with chords"
  and (rudimentary) two part writing is a fine one.  But just now looking
  over th Granata pieces (the ones with violin/'viola') - although there
  is the odd bar or two of melodic flow, I'd say 90% or so is basic
  two-part (i.e.utterly typical guitar) writing.
  Stuart
  >     --- On Tue, 8/2/11, Stuart Walsh<[1]s.wa...@ntlworld.com>  wrote:
  >
  >       From: Stuart Walsh<[2]s.wa...@ntlworld.com>
  >       Subject: [VIHUELA] Re: The stringing of the baroque guitar -
  again
  >       To: "Martyn Hodgson"<[3]hodgsonmar...@yahoo.co.uk>
  >       Cc: "Vihuelalist"<[4]vihuela@cs.dartmouth.edu>, "Monica Hall"
  >       <[5]mjlh...@tiscali.co.uk>
  >       Date: Tuesday, 8 February, 2011, 10:47
  >
  >        On 08/02/2011 10:09, Martyn Hodgson wrote:
  >        Dear Stuart,
  >        You write
  >         'what do you mean by "elaborate treble dominated style"? Is
  it
  >     this: a
  >        predominantly melodic line interspersed with occasional
  chords?
  >     Which
  >        composers are you thinking of?'
  >        I don't know what others are thinking of, but I mentioned that
  the
  >        similarity between much (especially Italian) guitar writing
  and that
  >        for unaccompanied violin by such as Schmelzer, Biber, Matteis
  had
  >        struck me some years ago. Almost all guitar composer exhibit
  this in
  >        pieces from time to time but some particular ones which I
  recall
  >     being
  >        examplars of the fashion were: Pellegrini(1650),
  Carbonchi(1640),
  >        Pesori(1648), Coriandoli(1670), Valdambrini (1646/7),
  Bottazzari
  >        (1663), Granata (various)....... A good example of the
  practice in
  >        operation and a interesting perspective on this style is also
  shed
  >     by
  >        those few pieces which actually do have an independent bass
  line as
  >        well as guitar tablature (eg Granata Op 5 of 1674 for violin,
  bass
  >        violin and guitar) - the guitar 'bass' is often skeletal at
  best and
  >        often non-existant whereas the guitar does double most of the
  >        independent upper melodic line.
  >        Well, looking at  Granata's  Novi Capricci Armonic Musicali:
  the
  >     first
  >        few pieces have a guitar part on the left hand side (in tab)
  and a
  >        score for violin and a ('viola'=bass?) part on the right. If
  it's
  >        assumed that the guitar is playing along with the bass line
  (and
  >        violin), nevertheless the guitar parts stand as pieces in
  their own
  >        right with basic, sketchy, two-part writing (plus chords here
  and
  >        there).  There are passages which are just the melodic line
  but
  >     still
  >        most of the writing is rudimentary two-part....but like much
  writing
  >        for guitar before  or since.
  >        Stuart
  >        Of course if anyone really wanted to push the matter and
  insist that
  >     a
  >        proper through bass was always present, I suppose it might be
  >     possible
  >        to construct a bass line (of sorts) from the lowest notes
  (depending
  >     on
  >        stringing!) of the strummed chords......
  >        Martyn
  >        --- On Mon, 7/2/11, Stuart Walsh
  [1]<[1][6]s.wa...@ntlworld.com>  wrote:
  >          From: Stuart Walsh [2]<[2][7]s.wa...@ntlworld.com>
  >          Subject: [VIHUELA] Re: The stringing of the baroque guitar -
  again
  >          To: "Monica Hall" [3]<[3][8]mjlh...@tiscali.co.uk>
  >          Cc: "Vihuelalist" [4]<[4][9]vihuela@cs.dartmouth.edu>
  >          Date: Monday, 7 February, 2011, 22:22
  >        On 07/02/2011 17:21, Monica Hall wrote:
  >        >  This was my summary.   It caused outrage in some quarters
  but I
  >     still
  >        stand by most of it.
  >        >
  >        >  1.      Both the conventional and re-entrant tunings were
  >     considered
  >        appropriate for strummed music and choice of one or the other
  was a
  >        matter of practical convenience.
  >        >  2.      The development of an elaborate treble dominated
  style
  >     after
  >        1640 led to a preference for re-entrant stringing.
  >        Monica, what do you mean by "elaborate treble dominated
  style"? Is
  >     it
  >        this: a predominantly melodic line interspersed with
  occasional
  >     chords?
  >        Which composers are you thinking of?
  >        The small amount of fancier music for the English
  guitar/guittar in
  >     the
  >        18th century  actually, literally looks like this - melodic
  lines -
  >        single melodic lines and then occasional chords. But
  five-course
  >     guitar
  >        music doesn't look like this at all. It looks like there's
  some kind
  >     of
  >        bass and treble - it looks like, at least, two part music.
  >        If the guitar is playing in this "elaborate treble dominated
  style"
  >     (as
  >        I am interpreting you as claiming) it would have to be in a
  >     re-entrant
  >        stringing, wouldn't it? It couldn't lead to a preference for
  it?
  >        >  3.      Perhaps as early as the 1650s Corbetta used bourdon
  on the
  >        fourth course.
  >        >  4.      This became the preferred method of stringing in
  France,
  >        England and the Low Countries and possibly also in Italy and
  Spain
  >        during the last quarter of the seventeenth and first quarter
  of the
  >        eighteenth centuries.
  >        >  5.      Developments in the way strings were made lead to
  regular
  >     use
  >        of octaves on both fourth and fifth courses and eventually to
  a
  >        6-course instrument.
  >        But you say in 1. (above) - the 'conventional' tuning? So, by
  that,
  >     you
  >        don't mean octaves on fourth and fifth? You mean AA and DD?
  >        Stuart
  >        >  6.      Different methods of stringing were probably used
  for solo
  >        music and realizing a bass line.
  >        >  7.      The evidence for octave stringing on the third
  course is
  >        ambiguous. Such a method of stringing would only be suitable
  for
  >        strummed music.
  >        >
  >        >  Do I hear howls of rage in the distance?
  >        >
  >        >  Monica
  >        >
  >        >
  >        >  To get on or off this list see list information at
  >        >
  [5][5][10]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
  >        >
  >        --
  >     References
  >        1. mailto:[6][11]s.wa...@ntlworld.com
  >        2. mailto:[7][12]s.wa...@ntlworld.com
  >        3. mailto:[8][13]mjlh...@tiscali.co.uk
  >        4. mailto:[9][14]vihuela@cs.dartmouth.edu
  >        5.
  [10][15]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/%7Ewbc/lute-admin/index.html
  >
  >     --
  >
  > References
  >
  >     1.
  [16]http://uk.mc263.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=s.wa...@ntlworld.com
  >     2.
  [17]http://uk.mc263.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=s.wa...@ntlworld.com
  >     3.
  [18]http://uk.mc263.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=mjlh...@tiscali.co.uk
  >     4.
  [19]http://uk.mc263.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=vihuela@cs.dartmouth.e
  du
  >     5. [20]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
  >     6.
  [21]http://uk.mc263.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=s.wa...@ntlworld.com
  >     7.
  [22]http://uk.mc263.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=s.wa...@ntlworld.com
  >     8.
  [23]http://uk.mc263.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=mjlh...@tiscali.co.uk
  >     9.
  [24]http://uk.mc263.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=vihuela@cs.dartmouth.e
  du
  >    10. [25]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
  >
  >

  --

References

  1. http://uk.mc263.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=s.wa...@ntlworld.com
  2. http://uk.mc263.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=s.wa...@ntlworld.com
3. http://uk.mc263.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=hodgsonmar...@yahoo.co.uk
  4. http://uk.mc263.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=vihuela@cs.dartmouth.edu
  5. http://uk.mc263.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=mjlh...@tiscali.co.uk
  6. http://uk.mc263.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=s.wa...@ntlworld.com
  7. http://uk.mc263.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=s.wa...@ntlworld.com
  8. http://uk.mc263.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=mjlh...@tiscali.co.uk
  9. http://uk.mc263.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=vihuela@cs.dartmouth.edu
 10. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
 11. http://uk.mc263.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=s.wa...@ntlworld.com
 12. http://uk.mc263.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=s.wa...@ntlworld.com
 13. http://uk.mc263.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=mjlh...@tiscali.co.uk
 14. http://uk.mc263.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=vihuela@cs.dartmouth.edu
 15. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
 16. http://uk.mc263.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=s.wa...@ntlworld.com
 17. http://uk.mc263.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=s.wa...@ntlworld.com
 18. http://uk.mc263.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=mjlh...@tiscali.co.uk
 19. http://uk.mc263.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=vihuela@cs.dartmouth.edu
 20. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
 21. http://uk.mc263.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=s.wa...@ntlworld.com
 22. http://uk.mc263.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=s.wa...@ntlworld.com
 23. http://uk.mc263.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=mjlh...@tiscali.co.uk
 24. http://uk.mc263.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=vihuela@cs.dartmouth.edu
 25. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html



Reply via email to