On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 10:51 AM, Markus Heidelberg <[email protected]> wrote: > Christian MICHON, 22.01.2009: >> On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 1:06 AM, Markus Heidelberg >> <[email protected]> wrote: >> > Christian MICHON, 21.01.2009: >> >> sending a git-bundle to a repo maintainer is actually better than >> >> sending patches. my 2 cents :) >> > >> > Maybe, I don't have experience with git-bundles. But why then is all the >> > git development done with either applying patches or pulling from repos? >> > I guess bundles can only work, if the bundle creator is the only one >> > committing to the corresponding branches. >> >> the beauty of git-bundles is when you are behind strong firewalls. > > OK, that's a point. But if you find a mail with a git-bundle in a list > archive, please show me :)
I sent one yesterday :) http://groups.google.com/group/msysgit/browse_thread/thread/8a01bbcc982e395a > >> Of course, the reason why people use patches is historical > > And for review. you can do review also with bundles if you dedicate a clone or a branch for that. > >> when I send patches from gmail, if they're not as attachment they >> become corrupted :( (long line limit is at 70 characters). > > Then why send from gmail at all? The web frontend of my provider is not > better, so I only use it, if necessary and I'm not at home. I do not want to pollute my professional email with spam (took years of silence to get rid of them). If I use a smtp interface to gmail, it's fine (but troublesome). -- Christian -- http://detaolb.sourceforge.net/, a linux distribution for Qemu with Git inside ! --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
