2010/5/25 Dominique Pellé <dominique.pe...@gmail.com>: > Nikolai Weibull wrote:
>> That said, I think persistent undo is more or less useless and, well, >> just a big pile of potential problems. Persistent undo is in the >> version control system, not in the editor. > I think this is a bit harsh. And I think persistent undo is a lot problematic and only a bit useful. > Not every file is in version control. And that’s the problem. > And even if you do use a version control system, persistent undo > allows you to undo with a smaller granularity than simply > reverting revisions in version control system. One user added a FileWritePost autocmd to commit changed files to Git whenever he saved. Not that I’d recommend that, but that’s a solution. > Users of Vim find different features more or less useful. And persistent undo is on par with window tabs in terms of usefulness, just above floating point numbers. -- You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
