Reply to message «Re: google summer of code», 
sent 00:28:28 09 March 2011, Wednesday
by Marc Weber:

> Why do you want to parse it?
<...>
> Didn't knew about this being a problem
> Can you elaborate a little bit in which cases this bothers you
> implementing signs?
format.vim is an extensible text-to-markup (html/bbcode/latex, though only html 
targed is full-featured) translator. I do not want to place any signs, I want 
to 
get already placed by other plugins.

> Can you give vim-addon-signs a try?
I will probably read its code when I will create frawor/signs.vim module, but 
it 
definetly won't help me in getting signs placed by plugins that do not use vim-
addon-signs.

Original message:
> Excerpts from ZyX's message of Tue Mar 08 21:08:06 +0000 2011:
> 
>  support to my format.vim plugin, but the following facts stopped me:
> > 1. signs are accessible only with commands;
> > 2. command output (which I may parse) is translated;
> 
> Why do you want to parse it?
> 
> Can you give vim-addon-signs a try?
> 
> The idea is to declaratively tell Vim only about the state of signs
> which must be placed.
> All the update handling is done by the plugin.
> This assumes that you have less than a million of signs to place though.
> 
> This got rid of the annoying cumbersome api.
> 
> But you're right rtp being a setting is bad. THere should be
> setRTPList() and getRTPListk functions etc.
> 
> > 3. v:lang variable value is system-dependent.
> 
> Didn't knew about this being a problem
> Can you elaborate a little bit in which cases this bothers you
> implementing signs?
> 
> Marc Weber

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Raspunde prin e-mail lui