On Jul 27, 2016 6:20 AM, "Kazunobu Kuriyama" <kazunobu.kuriy...@gmail.com> wrote: > > 2016-07-27 17:01 GMT+09:00 Manuel Ortega <mannyvim...@gmail.com>: >> If "syntax on" is in the system vimrc as proposed, then I can't seem to find any way *at all* to disable the loading of the system menu.vim (short of unacceptable hacks like bash-aliasing 'vim' to 'vim -u ~/.vimrc'.) >> >> Not only that, but the variables in menu.vim intended to be settable by the user to stop certain segments from loading, i.e., >> >> let did_install_default_menus = 1 >> let no_buffers_menu =1 >> let did_install_syntax_menu = 1 >> >> ... have no effect in the user's vimrc because menu.vim is already loaded by the system vimrc's "syntax on". >> >> Please, please, remove "syntax on" from the proposal. There is no way for the user to undo its side-effects. >> >> -Manny > > > Hi, > > After having read your argument through, I’m still for ‘syntax on’. > > After all, the problem boils down to this: How many GUI users do they actually set go=+M? > > My bet is that the number is nearly zero. > > If our system menu were of such less importance that one could kill it at will, it would not be worth being called “the system menu.”
I'd wager it's more than you think. I know many people that change gvim to basically look like console vim. Personally, I set 'guioptions' to just "cM". Cheers, James -- -- You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "vim_dev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to vim_dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
