Gary Johnson wrote:
> [...]
>
> Not all of those would be my preference, but they seem reasonable,
> and as long as all of that is in a file and the compile-time
> defaults aren't changed, I'm fine with it.
>
> I was surprised by this:
>
> > " For Win32 GUI: remove 't' flag from 'guioptions': no tearoff menu entries
> > " let &guioptions = substitute(&guioptions, "t", "", "g")
>
> Why substitute() instead of just -=?
>
> set guioptions-=t
Yeah, and why is it commented out? Actually, why don't we make this the
default? I don't think anybody on MS-Windows wants tear-off menus,
unless you know them from Unix perhaps.
--
ROBIN: (warily) And if you get a question wrong?
ARTHUR: You are cast into the Gorge of Eternal Peril.
ROBIN: Oh ... wacho!
"Monty Python and the Holy Grail" PYTHON (MONTY) PICTURES LTD
/// Bram Moolenaar -- [email protected] -- http://www.Moolenaar.net \\\
/// sponsor Vim, vote for features -- http://www.Vim.org/sponsor/ \\\
\\\ an exciting new programming language -- http://www.Zimbu.org ///
\\\ help me help AIDS victims -- http://ICCF-Holland.org ///
--
--
You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"vim_dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
