On Jan 25, 7:37 pm, Tony Mechelynck
<antoine.mechely...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 25/01/09 18:35, Raúl Núñez de Arenas Coronado wrote:
> [...]
> > And yes, the "standard" terminal color shades are ugly.
> > Probably they were chosen to provide shades which were as
> > orthogonal as possible between them, don't know :? But they
> > are mostly useless for syntax highlighting. Fortunately the
> > 256 colors available for terminals provide good shades. They
> > fit a bit better IMHO with a black background, but I find a
> > white (or better, a light) background better because I focus
> > better (greater depth of field with my iris a bit more
> > closed).
> The ones I dislike most (at least in my konsole terminal) are
> "dark red" and "dark yellow", which are two shades of some
> kind of brown.
But who uses the defaults? (I'm not even sure what they are.)
The actual colors can be anything you want; they're determined
by the X resources, e.g.:
xterm.vt100.color0: #666666
in your .Xdefaults file. Or you can specify them explicitly
using the -xrm option when invoking xterm.
--
James Kanze (GABI Software) email:james.ka...@gmail.com
Conseils en informatique orientée objet/
Beratung in objektorientierter Datenverarbeitung
9 place Sémard, 78210 St.-Cyr-l'École, France, +33 (0)1 30 23 00 34
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message from the "vim_use" maillist.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
