Bob, I see a direct connection between the temperature of the inner nickel
holder and the LENR activity in that test. When I follow the falling nickel
box temperature I see that the LENR has the appearance of a relaxation
oscillator that can not quite operate on its own bias. It also makes a few
'strikes' as the nickel holder temperature falls. And, once the power is
reversed during the narrow pulse the temperature of the holder begins to rise
until approximately the same magnitude is reached when the oscillator restarts
and the temperature rapidly heads up due to LENR activity. Notice that when
input heater power is again reduced the temperature begins to fall rapidly as
in the first case. Saturation of the TC hides exactly what is happening.
There may be another interaction associated with magnetic coupling in the
Chinese test, but it is not that obvious to me. Many details need to be
uncovered before we can get to the bottom of this complex system.
Dave
-----Original Message-----
From: Bob Cook <frobertc...@hotmail.com>
To: vortex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.com>
Sent: Fri, Jun 19, 2015 2:07 am
Subject: [Vo]:Re: Cat stimultion
The recent Chinese test illustrated the rapid response to transient power
changes—much faster than can be justified by the thermal increases or decreases
of bulk materials. It seems evident that either electric fields or magnetic
fields or both are the stimulating input that allows the energy releases
associated with rapid temperature increases.
Bob Cook
From: Bob Higgins
Sent: Thursday, June 18, 2015 9:37 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Cat stimultion
Note that in Rossi's HotCat, the fuel chamber is much longer than in the
Parkhomov experiment. It is possible [speculation] that Rossi simply divides
the heater into 2 or more segments (from left to right in a horizontal HotCat
reactor). For example, lets say that there are 3 segments to the heater.
Perhaps the outer heater segments are the mouse and the inner heater segment is
the cat. Initially, all heaters are driven to bring the HotCat to operating
temperature. Then the center segment is turned OFF and operates in SSM while
the 2 outer segments remain heated. When the SSM begins to wane in the center,
the center heater is turned ON and the outer heaters are turned OFF so that the
outer segments operate in SSM. With the H2 and the liquid metal transferring
heat, perhaps each segment helps support the one adjacent to it in such a
configuration. This seems a little "cat and mouse -ish" to me.
I think the cat & mouse are probably much less exotic than what has been
proposed in this thread.
Bob Higgins
On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 9:17 PM, <mix...@bigpond.com> wrote:
In reply to Axil Axil's message of Thu, 18 Jun 2015 16:19:04 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
>The Hot cat reactor has an alumina shell that is transparent to infrared
>
>light in the LENR reactive range. Could the Mouse be producing light that
>
>gets through the alumina shell of the Cat to stimulate the Cat?
>
I was assuming that the cat and mouse were together in the same tube. Is this
assumption wrong?
Regards,
Robin van Spaandonk
http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/project.html
