http://arxiv.org/pdf/1203.5699.pdf
The P and A mesons in strong abelian magnetic field in SU(2) lattice gauge theory. http://physik.uni-graz.at/~dk-user/talks/Chernodub_25112013.pdf QCD in strong magnetic field On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 5:04 PM, Bob Cook <frobertc...@hotmail.com> wrote: > Axil-- > > Do you have a reference paper for the creation of mesons from the vacuum > magnetic energy? > > If what you suggest is possible then it may also be possible to create > mesons in a strong magnetic field such as that created in transient SPP > entities. I would agree that, if muons are formed, muon catalyzed fusion > of D-D to He is possible, as well as Li-7 to Be-8 and who knows what else. > > Bob Cook > > *From:* Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> > *Sent:* Friday, June 19, 2015 11:32 AM > *To:* vortex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.com> > *Subject:* Re: [Vo]:Re: Cat stimultion > > My theory posits the production of mesons through the convertion of > magnetic energy from the vacume into sub atomic particles. The mesons decay > into muons (via the Schwinger limit) and the fusion is muon catalized > fusion. There is a repodt of electrostatic fields around the Cat. This > could be due to the decay of muons into electrons. > > The E Cat might be producing loads of anti muon neutrinos. That is what > will defined the fusion process that is going on. > > On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 1:56 PM, Bob Cook <frobertc...@hotmail.com> wrote: > >> Fran-- >> >> The new science currently at bay is the source of energy IMHO. I think >> it is small losses of mass to heat. Exchange of energy with the Dirac sea >> is another possibility. The evidence seems to me to indicate loss of mass >> is the source. >> >> Are there any theories that include an exchange mechanism of mass to >> energy besides the change of electron and positron mass to EM radiations or >> photons. I am not sure what is excepted for the mechanism of the separation >> of quarks and the disposition of gluons or reactions of other >> anti-particles? >> >> What's your best guess about the energy source--assuming energy is >> conserved and entropy in a closed system increases. >> >> The referenced paper discusses spin of electrons but seems to leave out >> the consideration of angular momentum and its conservation. Maybe I missed >> this feature in my quick review of that paper. >> >> >> >> Thanks for that interesting link: >> http://www.actaphys.uj.edu.pl/_old/vol27/pdf/v27p2409.pdf >> >> Bob Cook >> >> -----Original Message----- From: Roarty, Francis X >> Sent: Friday, June 19, 2015 3:29 AM >> To: vortex-l@eskimo.com >> Subject: Re: [Vo]:Cat stimultion >> >> I maintain that Rossi's E- Cat and Shawyer's EM drive are both based on >> "Cavity QED". In Zofia Birula 1996 paper >> http://www.actaphys.uj.edu.pl/_old/vol27/pdf/v27p2409.pdf she describes >> Rydberg atoms with modified spontaneous emissions by virtue of microwave >> cavity suppression. In the interim since her paper was published we have >> seen Japanese patents for radioactive remediation based on nano powders >> that employ this principle. WRT shawyer her paper states [snip] In a good >> cavity with dimensions of the order of the wavelength of emitted radiation, >> a very strong enhancement of spontaneous emissions is possible [/snip] Her >> math for these effects include Lorentzian formulations that underscore a >> relativistic perspective [Jan Naudt's 2005 paper on the hydrino as >> relativistic hydrogen] where hydrogen atoms entering nano scale cavities >> grow smaller from our perspective - through interactions between local and >> global energy scales in opposition. IOW nano mirror boundaries can >> segregate vacuum wavelengths in tiny cavities that conflict with the macro >> isotropy..not that this represents an an energy source or drive system in >> itself as it will react symmetrically to propagation of waves or particles >> passing through the cavity but it is the common engine block being employed >> in all these anomalous claims.. it can be a motor or a generator depending >> on how we employ it. In the case of the cat and mouse I suspect the breach >> in isotropy also allows for a breach in COE that we would never see at our >> macro scale where we have to "pay" to move a macro object into and out of a >> gravity well but at the nano scale we harness HUP to migrate gas atoms >> through a tapestry of different gravitational warps [negative >> gravity/vacuum densities based on mirror separation]. Imagine how easy a >> perpetual motion machine would be to make if you could turn off gravity for >> a half cycle while lifting a weight. I am not saying that we are getting >> something for nothing but rather that nano geometry can harness HUP to move >> the atom between different zones [no need for a spatial bias like >> Maxwellian demon only criteria becomes random motion]then it is left to us >> to somehow exploit this motion.. force an asymmetry between zones that >> generates heat but here everyone has their own pet theories. >> Fran >> >> >
