There is a huge amount of EMF amplification involved in nanoparticle aggregation. The amplification is proportional to the size difference between a 10 micron particle and a 1 nanometer space between nanoparticles, That is a gain of 10,000. the microparticle act as a dipole antenna that receives heat energy from a wide volume that surrounds it.
Fusion is the result of huge energy concentration where the energy gathered by the microparticle is concentrated into a sub nanometer spot. In addition, this EMF is frequency converted from heat into x-rays and XUV range which is another means for EMF power amplification. The wave length of the XUV EMF (10 nanometers) is the "black light" that Mills sees in his early LENR experiments and is the circumference of the SPP soliton that stores the light that produces the reaction. By the way, Mills' company is called Blacklight Power. There may be other amplification processes involving global Bose condensation that might add another 10 billion to the total EMF gain. This is called super-radiance. On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 2:45 PM, Axil Axil <[email protected]> wrote: > By the way, the magnetic energy to muon conversion process does not > violate any conservation laws. The production of electrons by the particle > condinsation process is a drag on the COP of the reactor. > > On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 2:39 PM, Axil Axil <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> http://www.e-catworld.com/2014/08/07/rossi-on-electrostatic-force-from-the-e-cat/ >> >> Rossi on ‘Electrostatic’ Force from the E-Cat >> >> On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 2:32 PM, Axil Axil <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> My theory posits the production of mesons through the convertion of >>> magnetic energy from the vacume into sub atomic particles. The mesons decay >>> into muons (via the Schwinger limit) and the fusion is muon catalized >>> fusion. There is a repodt of electrostatic fields around the Cat. This >>> could be due to the decay of muons into electrons. >>> >>> The E Cat might be producing loads of anti muon neutrinos. That is what >>> will defined the fusion process that is going on. >>> >>> On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 1:56 PM, Bob Cook <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Fran-- >>>> >>>> The new science currently at bay is the source of energy IMHO. I think >>>> it is small losses of mass to heat. Exchange of energy with the Dirac sea >>>> is another possibility. The evidence seems to me to indicate loss of mass >>>> is the source. >>>> >>>> Are there any theories that include an exchange mechanism of mass to >>>> energy besides the change of electron and positron mass to EM radiations or >>>> photons. I am not sure what is excepted for the mechanism of the separation >>>> of quarks and the disposition of gluons or reactions of other >>>> anti-particles? >>>> >>>> What's your best guess about the energy source--assuming energy is >>>> conserved and entropy in a closed system increases. >>>> >>>> The referenced paper discusses spin of electrons but seems to leave >>>> out the consideration of angular momentum and its conservation. Maybe I >>>> missed this feature in my quick review of that paper. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Thanks for that interesting link: >>>> http://www.actaphys.uj.edu.pl/_old/vol27/pdf/v27p2409.pdf >>>> >>>> Bob Cook >>>> >>>> -----Original Message----- From: Roarty, Francis X >>>> Sent: Friday, June 19, 2015 3:29 AM >>>> To: [email protected] >>>> Subject: Re: [Vo]:Cat stimultion >>>> >>>> I maintain that Rossi's E- Cat and Shawyer's EM drive are both based on >>>> "Cavity QED". In Zofia Birula 1996 paper >>>> http://www.actaphys.uj.edu.pl/_old/vol27/pdf/v27p2409.pdf she >>>> describes Rydberg atoms with modified spontaneous emissions by virtue of >>>> microwave cavity suppression. In the interim since her paper was published >>>> we have seen Japanese patents for radioactive remediation based on nano >>>> powders that employ this principle. WRT shawyer her paper states [snip] In >>>> a good cavity with dimensions of the order of the wavelength of emitted >>>> radiation, a very strong enhancement of spontaneous emissions is possible >>>> [/snip] Her math for these effects include Lorentzian formulations that >>>> underscore a relativistic perspective [Jan Naudt's 2005 paper on the >>>> hydrino as relativistic hydrogen] where hydrogen atoms entering nano scale >>>> cavities grow smaller from our perspective - through interactions between >>>> local and global energy scales in opposition. IOW nano mirror boundaries >>>> can segregate vacuum wavelengths in tiny cavities that conflict with the >>>> macro isotropy..not that this represents an an energy source or drive >>>> system in itself as it will react symmetrically to propagation of waves or >>>> particles passing through the cavity but it is the common engine block >>>> being employed in all these anomalous claims.. it can be a motor or a >>>> generator depending on how we employ it. In the case of the cat and mouse I >>>> suspect the breach in isotropy also allows for a breach in COE that we >>>> would never see at our macro scale where we have to "pay" to move a macro >>>> object into and out of a gravity well but at the nano scale we harness HUP >>>> to migrate gas atoms through a tapestry of different gravitational warps >>>> [negative gravity/vacuum densities based on mirror separation]. Imagine how >>>> easy a perpetual motion machine would be to make if you could turn off >>>> gravity for a half cycle while lifting a weight. I am not saying that we >>>> are getting something for nothing but rather that nano geometry can harness >>>> HUP to move the atom between different zones [no need for a spatial bias >>>> like Maxwellian demon only criteria becomes random motion]then it is left >>>> to us to somehow exploit this motion.. force an asymmetry between zones >>>> that generates heat but here everyone has their own pet theories. >>>> Fran >>>> >>>> >>> >> >
