Fran--
The new science currently at bay is the source of energy IMHO. I think it
is small losses of mass to heat. Exchange of energy with the Dirac sea is
another possibility. The evidence seems to me to indicate loss of mass is
the source.
Are there any theories that include an exchange mechanism of mass to energy
besides the change of electron and positron mass to EM radiations or
photons. I am not sure what is excepted for the mechanism of the separation
of quarks and the disposition of gluons or reactions of other
anti-particles?
What's your best guess about the energy source--assuming energy is conserved
and entropy in a closed system increases.
The referenced paper discusses spin of electrons but seems to leave out the
consideration of angular momentum and its conservation. Maybe I missed this
feature in my quick review of that paper.
Thanks for that interesting link:
http://www.actaphys.uj.edu.pl/_old/vol27/pdf/v27p2409.pdf
Bob Cook
-----Original Message-----
From: Roarty, Francis X
Sent: Friday, June 19, 2015 3:29 AM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Cat stimultion
I maintain that Rossi's E- Cat and Shawyer's EM drive are both based on
"Cavity QED". In Zofia Birula 1996 paper
http://www.actaphys.uj.edu.pl/_old/vol27/pdf/v27p2409.pdf she describes
Rydberg atoms with modified spontaneous emissions by virtue of microwave
cavity suppression. In the interim since her paper was published we have
seen Japanese patents for radioactive remediation based on nano powders that
employ this principle. WRT shawyer her paper states [snip] In a good cavity
with dimensions of the order of the wavelength of emitted radiation, a very
strong enhancement of spontaneous emissions is possible [/snip] Her math for
these effects include Lorentzian formulations that underscore a relativistic
perspective [Jan Naudt's 2005 paper on the hydrino as relativistic hydrogen]
where hydrogen atoms entering nano scale cavities grow smaller from our
perspective - through interactions between local and global energy scales in
opposition. IOW nano mirror boundaries can segregate vacuum wavelengths in
tiny cavities that conflict with the macro isotropy..not that this
represents an an energy source or drive system in itself as it will react
symmetrically to propagation of waves or particles passing through the
cavity but it is the common engine block being employed in all these
anomalous claims.. it can be a motor or a generator depending on how we
employ it. In the case of the cat and mouse I suspect the breach in isotropy
also allows for a breach in COE that we would never see at our macro scale
where we have to "pay" to move a macro object into and out of a gravity well
but at the nano scale we harness HUP to migrate gas atoms through a tapestry
of different gravitational warps [negative gravity/vacuum densities based on
mirror separation]. Imagine how easy a perpetual motion machine would be to
make if you could turn off gravity for a half cycle while lifting a weight.
I am not saying that we are getting something for nothing but rather that
nano geometry can harness HUP to move the atom between different zones [no
need for a spatial bias like Maxwellian demon only criteria becomes random
motion]then it is left to us to somehow exploit this motion.. force an
asymmetry between zones that generates heat but here everyone has their own
pet theories.
Fran
