By the way, the magnetic energy to muon conversion process does not violate any conservation laws. The production of electrons by the particle condinsation process is a drag on the COP of the reactor.
On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 2:39 PM, Axil Axil <[email protected]> wrote: > > http://www.e-catworld.com/2014/08/07/rossi-on-electrostatic-force-from-the-e-cat/ > > Rossi on ‘Electrostatic’ Force from the E-Cat > > On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 2:32 PM, Axil Axil <[email protected]> wrote: > >> My theory posits the production of mesons through the convertion of >> magnetic energy from the vacume into sub atomic particles. The mesons decay >> into muons (via the Schwinger limit) and the fusion is muon catalized >> fusion. There is a repodt of electrostatic fields around the Cat. This >> could be due to the decay of muons into electrons. >> >> The E Cat might be producing loads of anti muon neutrinos. That is what >> will defined the fusion process that is going on. >> >> On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 1:56 PM, Bob Cook <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> Fran-- >>> >>> The new science currently at bay is the source of energy IMHO. I think >>> it is small losses of mass to heat. Exchange of energy with the Dirac sea >>> is another possibility. The evidence seems to me to indicate loss of mass >>> is the source. >>> >>> Are there any theories that include an exchange mechanism of mass to >>> energy besides the change of electron and positron mass to EM radiations or >>> photons. I am not sure what is excepted for the mechanism of the separation >>> of quarks and the disposition of gluons or reactions of other >>> anti-particles? >>> >>> What's your best guess about the energy source--assuming energy is >>> conserved and entropy in a closed system increases. >>> >>> The referenced paper discusses spin of electrons but seems to leave out >>> the consideration of angular momentum and its conservation. Maybe I missed >>> this feature in my quick review of that paper. >>> >>> >>> >>> Thanks for that interesting link: >>> http://www.actaphys.uj.edu.pl/_old/vol27/pdf/v27p2409.pdf >>> >>> Bob Cook >>> >>> -----Original Message----- From: Roarty, Francis X >>> Sent: Friday, June 19, 2015 3:29 AM >>> To: [email protected] >>> Subject: Re: [Vo]:Cat stimultion >>> >>> I maintain that Rossi's E- Cat and Shawyer's EM drive are both based on >>> "Cavity QED". In Zofia Birula 1996 paper >>> http://www.actaphys.uj.edu.pl/_old/vol27/pdf/v27p2409.pdf she >>> describes Rydberg atoms with modified spontaneous emissions by virtue of >>> microwave cavity suppression. In the interim since her paper was published >>> we have seen Japanese patents for radioactive remediation based on nano >>> powders that employ this principle. WRT shawyer her paper states [snip] In >>> a good cavity with dimensions of the order of the wavelength of emitted >>> radiation, a very strong enhancement of spontaneous emissions is possible >>> [/snip] Her math for these effects include Lorentzian formulations that >>> underscore a relativistic perspective [Jan Naudt's 2005 paper on the >>> hydrino as relativistic hydrogen] where hydrogen atoms entering nano scale >>> cavities grow smaller from our perspective - through interactions between >>> local and global energy scales in opposition. IOW nano mirror boundaries >>> can segregate vacuum wavelengths in tiny cavities that conflict with the >>> macro isotropy..not that this represents an an energy source or drive >>> system in itself as it will react symmetrically to propagation of waves or >>> particles passing through the cavity but it is the common engine block >>> being employed in all these anomalous claims.. it can be a motor or a >>> generator depending on how we employ it. In the case of the cat and mouse I >>> suspect the breach in isotropy also allows for a breach in COE that we >>> would never see at our macro scale where we have to "pay" to move a macro >>> object into and out of a gravity well but at the nano scale we harness HUP >>> to migrate gas atoms through a tapestry of different gravitational warps >>> [negative gravity/vacuum densities based on mirror separation]. Imagine how >>> easy a perpetual motion machine would be to make if you could turn off >>> gravity for a half cycle while lifting a weight. I am not saying that we >>> are getting something for nothing but rather that nano geometry can harness >>> HUP to move the atom between different zones [no need for a spatial bias >>> like Maxwellian demon only criteria becomes random motion]then it is left >>> to us to somehow exploit this motion.. force an asymmetry between zones >>> that generates heat but here everyone has their own pet theories. >>> Fran >>> >>> >> >
