On Thu, Aug 6, 2015 at 10:27 AM, Jones Beene <jone...@pacbell.net> wrote:
> reticence Jones you might be right but why make a judgment before fact is in? His reports are positive and if he fabricate all his anecdotes, as you call his reports. then we can agree he is good at that. However, LENR has been in the progress for 25 plus years. Why not let him show the reality of his claim or fail - it is only 2/3 of a year. Do you know that IH are backing out of the deal? Do you know that AR is distancing himself from IH? I think to compare him to Madoff is unfair. I can see no real motive besides that he wants more funding for a project you believe he has no believe in. Would it not be better to have a low key attitude. His personality is real hard to judge from a distance. (You might have better knowledge . . .). Experience and expertise - I assume you mean of LENR. If as you say "One can believe strongly in the reality of LENR technology – as most of do on this forum", then don't you need to support the efforts to find an answer? You say that it might work partially. Well I would say that the first flight of the Wright brothers were 'partial' flights. Don't your final conclusion start with an "If". How can IH be ripped off? Whatever investment they have done with open eyes and with a lot of negative 'press' about AR, which I am sure they have access to or tehy did not handle this investment very well. Best Regards , Lennart Thornros www.StrategicLeadershipSac.com lenn...@thornros.com +1 916 436 1899 202 Granite Park Court, Lincoln CA 95648 “Productivity is never an accident. It is always the result of a commitment to excellence, intelligent planning, and focused effort.” PJM
